Regionalization in South Asia

Theory and Praxis

Bibliographic Data

ID2882637
AuthorsAnanya Mukherjee Reed (York University, corresponding author)
Year1997
Volume70
Issue2
Pages235
Publication date1997-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePacific Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2760774
OpenAlexW2322355746
LanguageEN
Citations received9

HISTORICALLY, regional cooperation in South Asia has been fraught with problems.' The political reasons behind this apathy towards regionalization, as is well known, involve serious strifes in which the countries of the region are mired.2 The legacy of British imperialism and its impact on state formation in South Asia have produced an almost permanent set of relations that pre-empt regional economic cooperation. As a result, since its inception in 1985, the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) remained, for a long time, a somewhat defunct political organization. In the 1990s however, SAARC has gathered some momentum, due mainly to the forces of globalization and economic liberalization within many of the SAARC countries. Two particularly significant aspects of this development have been the formation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the rising vehemence of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). This paper will examine these changes in the trajectory of SAARC, and, more generally, the problems and prospects of regional cooperation in South Asia. I will argue here that (a) the new regionalism in South Asia is almost entirely a product of the contradictions of globalization, which increases competition on the one hand, and the need for collaboration on the other; (b) institutional structures, in and of themselves, cannot generate solutions to problems that emanate out of historical processes and structures; and (c) feasible strategies for cooperation in South Asia require the mobilization of nonstate actors, especially firms and groups undertaking various social movements

Geography · Political science · Praxis · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Global trade and economics · Law · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub