The New Japanese Election System
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2889656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raymond V Christensen (University of Kansas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 49 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pacific Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2760873 |
| OpenAlex | W2312453050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
ESPITE the promise of bold and innovative action, doubts are increasing as to whether the recent upheavals in Japanese politics will actually transform government and politics in Japan. When the coalition of Liberal Democratic party (LDP) renegades and opposition parties ousted the LDP from power in mid-1993, they made electoral reform their first and most important legislative priority. The reforms they passed in 1994 became the most significant legislative accomplishment of the first post-LDP government, yet will these reforms actually transform Japanese politics as promised? It is claimed that these new electoral rules will change the way parties are organized, the flow of campaign funds, the scandal-ridden nature of Japanese politics, and the relevance of policies and issues in campaigns.' Many have assumed that the new electoral system will cause the emergence and maintenance of two moderate political parties that will alternate in power. Even grander speculations have been made about the entire reformist agenda. Some suggest thatJapan's new political leaders will usher in a new era of less bureaucratic and more democratic politics. The leaders of this more efficient government will rescue the long-suffering Japanese consumer, improve the frayed nature of U.S.-Japan relations, and create a modern Japan that will revise its anachronistic ban on the maintenance or use of military force.2 Other observers have been quick to take an opposite and extreme position that no real changes were occurring. In contrast to both approaches, those with a more careful and studied perspective ofJapan have been more reticent to draw grand conclusions about the permanent changes in the Japanese political landscape.3 In this latter perspective, I will review and
Political science · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Domestic Determinants of Japan's China Aid Policy
A Big Bang for Japanese Mandarins? The Civil Service Reform of 2014
Can Japan disengage? Winners and losers in Japan's political economy, and the ties that bind them
Individual and contextual determinants of adoption of online media services in the 2017 lower house election campaign in Japan
Economics, culture, and electoral reform
Political clientelism in Thai provinces
Japanese Lower House Campaigns in Transition
Electoral reform and its discontents
Grading Japanese Prime Minister Koizumi's Revolution
Financing democracy in Japan
Issue Ownership and Electoral Rule
Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
Reapportionment and Redistribution
Japan's new electoral system
Urban outfitters
Who gains from apparentments under D'Hondt
| Unique citing works | 16 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,59 |
| Citation span | 1999 - 2020 (22) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |