Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tenure rights and ancestral domains in the Philippines. A study of the roots of conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID2889894
AuthorsBen S Malayang Iii (1. [email protected]), Ben S Malayang (Royal Netherlands Institute of Southeast Asian and Caribbean Studies, corresponding author)
Year2001
Volume157
Issue3
Pages661-676
Publication date2001-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0006-2294 • E-ISSN: 2213-4379
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/22134379-90003805
OpenAlexW1995915657
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited2

A Study of the Roots of ConflictThe tragedy of colonization in the Philippines is that it created a country but splintered a people. 1 It unified a scattering of self-ruling communities into a single state but divided its citizens into those who acquired power from colonization and those who lost power because they avoided colonization (Duhaylungsod 1996;Lynch 1984).Colonization consolidated the Philippines into a political unit when it became a colony of Spain after Magellan claimed the entire Mas de Filipinas for the Spanish king in 1521 (Douglas 1970).The present Philippine republic emerged by revolutionary declaration from the Spanish colonial claim in 1898 but was unable to function as a free political entity because of subsequent colonial suppression by the United States following its defeat of Spain in 1899.The Americans ultimately gave up the territory in 1946, however, and the Philippines became an independent and sovereign state.Colonization divided the Filipino people into two groups, each with a different experience of colonization.The first group comprises the 'C-Filipinos', the colonized.They were co-opted by and collaborated with the colonial regime.They cross-bred with the colonial rulers, became acculturated into colonial ways, were christianized and were often coastal in their settlement pattern.The second group comprises the 'I-Filipinos', who were generally considered to be politically irrelevant.They were often impoverished because of economic and political marginalization, indigenous in their ways, often inland in their habitation, and generally successful in keeping their cultures intact in the face of colonization

Archaeology · Biology · Colonialism · Colonization · Economic history · Ethnology · Geography · Indigenous · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Settlement (finance · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Ecology · History · Law · Philippine History and Culture

  • Kupasan Terhadap Kritikan Terpilih Renato Constantino

    Open Access•Nur Dayana Mohamed Ariffin•SEJARAH•2022

  • State Recognition or State Appropriation? Land Rights and Land Disputes among the Bugkalot/Ilongot of Northern Luzon, Philippines

    Open Access•Shu-Yuan Yang, Shuyuan Yang•Southeast Asian studies•2012

  • Indigenous environmental defenders and the legacy of Macli-ing Dulag

    Open Access•Laurence L Delina•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • State versus Indigenous Peoples’ Rights

    Marvin Joseph F Montefrio•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2014

  • The New States of Asia

    Richard C Gripp, Michael Brecher•The Western Political Quarterly•1964

  • The Hispanization of the Philippines. Spanish Aims and Filipino Responses 1565-1700

    D G E Hall, John Leddy Phelan•Pacific Affairs•1959

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2012 - 2022 (11)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae