Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

India and Sikkim

Redefining the Relationship

Bibliographic Data

ID2897933
AuthorsLeo E Rose (University of California, Berkeley, corresponding author)
Year1969
Volume42
Issue1
Pages32
Publication date1969-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePacific Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0030-851X • E-ISSN: 1715-3379
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2754861
OpenAlexW2319810138
LanguageEN
Citations received3

THE SINO-INDIAN BORDER DISPUTE, now entering its tenth year of smoldering hostility with occasional eruptions, inevitably has had a significant impact upon India's relation with the three small monarchies on its northern border-Nepal, Bhutan, and Sikkim. Over the course of the past decade a new accommodation has been painfully achieved with Nepal, which promises substantial stability for the future. The process of redefining India's relationship with Bhutan is not as far advanced as that with Nepal, but the broad outlines are already visible, and a mutually satisfactory solution can be expected. Sikkim, on the other hand, has so far enjoyed only limited success in its prolonged dialogue with the government of India over redefinition of the relationship between the two states. This is not surprising, perhaps, as Sikkim occupies what may be the most strategic and exposed position in the incredibly complex and volatile frontier region between South Asia and China. Not only is Sikkim the major channel of communication between India and Tibet under normal conditions, it is also the connecting link between the predominantly Hindu culture of the central Himalaya and the Buddhist and animist communities in the eastern Himalaya. Sikkim's historical background is another factor complicating its relations with India and making changes in its status more difficult to accomplish. The British government of India usually preferred tacit understandings and implicit commitments with the buffer states on the northern rim of the Indian empire. A unique combination of circumstances centering around the efforts to open Tibet in the latter decades of the nineteenth century finally led the British to establish a formal protectorate over Sikkim, one that was later recognized by China in the Anglo-Chinese Treaty of i890. This did not entirely remove the ambiguity with regard to Sikkim's international status. Sikkim was never a feudatory Native State in the precise meaning of that term in British India, but neither was it independent or even internally autonomous. Obviously the British were under no great compulsion to clarify the situation in the absence of effective challenges to their predominant position throughout the eastern Himalaya. This carefully contrived but informal process for manipulating the three buffer states on the northern frontier was both inadequate and inappropriate

Geography · Political science · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · South Asian Studies and Diaspora

  • Frontier density in urban India

    Open Access•D Mcduie-Ra•Urban Studies•2026

  • Subject and citizen

    Sunil Pradhan•Asian Ethnicity•2021

  • Himalayan Boom Town

    Open Access•D Mcduie-Ra, Mona Chettri•Development and Change•2018

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae