The Phonemics of Modern Icelandic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2898691 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Einar Haugen (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1958 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 55 |
| Publication date | 1958-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-8507 • E-ISSN: 1535-0665 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/411276 |
| OpenAlex | W3142305221 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
The past three decades have seen a number of monographs and articles on the phonetics of Icelandic, but little has yet been done with its phonemics. A first attempt was made by Kemp Malone in a paper read to the Linguistic Society in 1950, but this was drastically amended in a note he published three years later in LANGUAGE. There is a vigorous dogmatism in Malone's approach to phonemics, unhampered by those ifs and buts which strew the discourse of more cautious scholars. Although he claims to have taken account of phonemic work done since 1923, when he published his Phonology of Modern Icelandic , there are no references to indicate the scope of his reading, and few traces in his work of the ideas advanced by other scholars. His only statement of principle is this: 'I have tried first of all to classify each isolable speech-sound as an allophone of some phoneme.' He provides minimal pairs for each phoneme and a brief statement of its distribution. But we do not learn just how he isolated these speech sounds and overlooked others, or what criteria permitted him to classify the sounds with one phoneme and not another. Neither is there any description of the larger units into which the phonemes enter, or any consideration of alternative analyses such as we have been taught to expect in recent phonemic work. That alternatives are possible becomes apparent in his reconsideration of the prosodic system, which permitted him to reduce the number of phonemes at one blow from 61 to 39. This change suggests that there is room for further consideration of Icelandic phonemics. It will be the purpose of this paper to explore various possible analyses of Modern Icelandic as a contribution to what has been called the 'indeterminacy' of phonemic systems and the ‘convertibility’ of different descriptions. We shall also take up some of the problems involved in finding the structure or structures of a language
Icelandic · Linguistics · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy
Zur Repräsentation der Vokallänge in der deutschen Standardsprache
Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items
La quantite en islandais modern
La quantité en islandais modern
On the Phonology of Icelandic Prespiration
An Experimental Study of Syllabification in Icelandic
The nature and use of Icelandic prenuclear and nuclear pitch accents
The Segmental and Superasegmental Status of Preaspiration in Modern Icelandic
Naturalness, Morphonology, and the Icelandic Velar Palatalisation
Velumtätigkeit bei der Erzeugung stimmhafter und stimmloser Nasalkonsonanten im Isländischen
Acquisition of the feature [+spread glottis] in Icelandic
Icelandic post-lexical syllabification and vowel length in CVCV phonology
Le système vocalique de l'islandais
Testing for underlying representations
Écologie (socio)linguistique
Phonetic evidence supporting a phonological analysis
Voiceless Nasal Phonemes in Icelandic
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.32 |
| Citation span | 1973 - 2024 (52) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |