Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The presentation of art

A museologist's dilemma

Bibliographic Data

ID2908770
AuthorsJan Pouwer (1. [email protected], corresponding author)
Year1988
Volume144
Issue4
Pages557-564
Publication date1988-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBijdragen tot de taal- land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0006-2294 • E-ISSN: 2213-4379
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/22134379-90003287
OpenAlexW2036414682
LanguageEN

In European and American private and public collections of 'primitive' or Oceanic artifacts, specimens of the Asmat culture, in the southwestern coastal region of Irian Jaya, rate as spectacular.In this respect, the Asmat area is sometimes even referred to as the Sepik area of West Irian!It is probably less well known that the artistic achievements of the Mimika people match the accomplishments of their eastern Asmat neighbours.The two areas are linguistically and culturally related, and significantly different.This invites comparison.Unfortunately, in terms of completed and published research, the situation is uneven: ethnoaesthetic investigations, particularly by A. A. Gerbrands, both in the field and in museum collections, supported by outstanding films and various exhibitions, such as the current one at the Rotterdam Ethnographic Museum, highlight Asmat artistics skills.However, a monograph on Asmat culture is still sadly lacking, in spite of fieldwork by and the considerable store of knowledge accumulated in the heads, fieldnotes and scarce publications of Father Zegwaard m.s.c, Father Trenkenschuh o.s.c, the Dutch linguist C. Voorhoeve, and the American anthropologist David Eyde.Consequently, the ethno-aesthetic knowledge of Asmat art exists in a socio-cultural vacuum, which is apparent from films and exhibitions.For Mimika the reverse obtains: there is a Mimika monograph, as well as a follow-up of various articles and papers written by the present reviewer.However, ethno-aesthetic fieldwork has not been carried out here.The publication of Kooijman's book, based on a painstaking analysis of collections in ethnographic museums at Leiden, Breda, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Cambridge and London, therefore, meets a distinct need.For information on the meaning, functions, and socio-cultural context of the objects, the author was dependent on invaluable typed reports and oral information provided by Zegwaard, on my own publications, on written information concerning objects collected by me, and on personal communications.Kooijman dearly wished to cooperate in a joint venture, in which I was invited to participate.Unfortu

Archaeology · Art · Art history · Dilemma · Ethnography · Exhibition · Fieldnotes · Presentation (obstetrics · Sociology · Visual arts · Anthropology · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae