Forgetting culturally diverse equity groups in Australian doctoral policy
What Happens When Population Parity Is Reached
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2931765 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Catherine Manathunga (0000-0001-8915-0344, University of the Sunshine Coast, autor de correspondencia), J Qi (0000-0003-3511-0712, RMIT University), Maria M Raciti (0000-0003-0548-3702, University of the Sunshine Coast) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 46 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 1-13 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-01-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Discourse Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0159-6306 • E-ISSN: 1469-3739 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01596306.2025.2457948 |
| OpenAlex | W4407025520 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 28 |
Population parity figures keep governments and universities accountable in ensuring that equity groups have access to higher education. However, what happens once population parity is reached? This paper explores Australian doctoral education policy on culturally and linguistically diverse (transcultural) domestic candidates. Using Foucauldian discourse analysis, we suggest that an overwhelming focus on counting avoids addressing vital epistemological questions about the diverse knowledge transcultural candidates bring to Australian research. We highlight the ways doctoral policies do not capture the significant diversities within transcultural communities. We recommend the use of Nancy Fraser’s concept of participatory parity instead of population parity in government policy as a way of incorporating three elements of social justice – redistribution, recognition and representation. Focusing on the element of recognition, we extend Fraser’s notion of cultural recognition to include valuing diverse cultural knowledge systems which might create the conditions for epistemic justice in Australian doctoral education policy
Demographic economics · Economics · Forgetting · Political science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Global Health Workforce Issues · Law · Psychology · Service-Learning and Community Engagement · Social Work Education and Practice
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?
International students enacting agency in their PhD journey
African refugee youth in Australia
Gender parity in higher education enrolments
A New History of the Irish in Australia
Lived Experiences of Multiculture
Shattered glass piling at the bottom
Closing the Gap
(Mis)framing Higher Education in South Africa
Critical internationalization studies at an impasse
Disciplining the Savages, Savaging the Disciplines
Examiner practices and culturally inflected doctoral theses
Forgetting culturally diverse equity groups in Australian doctoral policy
Decolonizing Methodologies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |