Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Comparative Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2963343 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Tager (Marietta College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Indigenous Policy Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1916-5781 • E-ISSN: 1916-5781 |
| Publisher | University of Western Ontario, Western Libraries (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.18584/iipj.2014.5.4.7 |
| OpenAlex | W43360198 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 12 |
Australia, Canada, and the United States formally apologized to their Indigenous peoples in February 2008, June 2008, and December 2009, respectively. The Indigenous peoples in these countries are relatively small in size and Indigenous issues usually lack salience in national elections, so these near simultaneous apologies appear somewhat surprising. All three came after years of pressure and incompletely realized apologies. The presence of a focusing event and the level of Indigenous mobilization help explain the variation among the apologies, with Canada and Australia's apologies stronger than the U.S. one. However, the impact of the apologies on the three governments' efforts to reconcile with their Indigenous populations remains unclear
Biology · Indigenous · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Ombudsman and Human Rights · Psychology · Ecology
Mea culpa
Making whole what has been smashed
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
The Apology in Australia
The BIA.'s Apology to Native Americans
The Politics of Official Apologies
Official Apologies and the Quest for Historical Justice
The Howard Government and Indigenous Rights
Indians in the United States and Canada
Shingwauk's Vision
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,22 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2021 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |