Structural Assimilation and Ethnic Fertility in Ghana
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2969261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Isaac Addai (0000-0003-1637-6320, Lansing Community College), Frank Troyato (Department of Sociology University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H4 Canada) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 409-427 |
| Publication date | 1999-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Comparative Family Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2328 • E-ISSN: 1929-9850 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/jcfs.30.3.409 |
| OpenAlex | W2210419936 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 20 |
This study explores the relative importance of socioeconomic and cthnic/cultural factors on possible convergence in reproduction among four and residual Ghanaian ethnic groups. Two views on differences in ethnic fertility have emerged in the literature. The first is the characteristics assimilation thesis which is based on the premise that when socioeconomic and demographic differences between social groups are statistically controlled, their fertility levels should converge. The other view, the cultural/ ethnic effect thesis, attributes group fertility differences to the influence of subgroup culture and experiences. No study in this area of research has explored the relative efficacy of these explanations within the context of Ghana. We study the Twi, the Fante/Other Akan, the Ewe and the Ga-Adangbe ethnic groups and the Northern Groups using data from the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey of 1993. The results derived from the analysis are more congruent with characteristics assimilation thesis because once sociodemographic differences between these groups and a standard population are equalized through statistical controls, the fertility differences virtually disappear. The cultural/ethnic hypothesis, which stresses the influence of group norms, beliefs, values and experiences in group behaviour, including reproduction, is of no importance among the groups under study
Context (archaeology) · Ethnic group · Fertility · Geography · Political science · Population · Social class · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Anthropology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Global Maternal and Child Health · Psychology · Social Psychology
Impaired Fertility and Perceived Difficulties Conceiving in Ghana
Ethnic Differences in Sexual Behaviour Among Unmarried Adolescents and Young Adults in Zimbabwe
The effect of education on the timing of marriage in Kenya
Fertility and urban context
Ethnicity and fertility desires in Ghana
Family-building strategies in urban India
Religious Affiliation and Childbearing Preferences of Iranian Women
Studies on African Families
Ethnicity and fertility of descendants of rural-to-urban migrants
Difficulties Conceiving and Relationship Stability in Sub-Saharan Africa
Immigrant–native fertility differentials
Ethnicity and fertility in Nigeria
Gender, lineage, and fertility-related outcomes in Ghana
Population, modernization, and social structure.
Assimilation in American life
Reproduction and Social Organization in Sub-Saharan Africa
The proximate determinants of fertility
Canadian Ethnic Fertility
Minority Group Status and Fertility
Social Theory and Social Structure
Ethnicity and fertility in Liberia
Hindu and Christian fertility in India
Minority status and family size
Fertility differentials among the tribal groups of Sierra Leone
Roman-catholicism and fertility in the Netherlands
Religion and Reproduction in Philippine Society
Lessons from the Past
The Proximate Determinants of Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa
The Cultural Context of High Fertility in sub-Saharan Africa
Did the Akan resort to abortion in pre-colonial Ghana? Some Conjectures
Ethnicity and Fertility
Minority-Group Status and Fertility
Minority Group Status and Fertility
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,57 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2023 (21) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |