Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Consensual Unions In Two Costa Rican Communities

An Analysis Using Focus Group Methodology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2991963
AutoresKaren Glaser (0000-0002-4436-1305, King's College London, autor de correspondencia)
Año1999
Volumen30
Número1
Páginas57-77
Fecha de publicación1999-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Comparative Family Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0047-2328 • E-ISSN: 1929-9850
EditorialUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/jcfs.30.1.57
OpenAlexW2602475363
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4
Referencias citadas5

This study uses focus groups to explore the nature of consensual unions and the relationship between union type and fertility in Costa Rica. Participants, both men and women, were drawn from two communities, La Cruz in the province of Guanacaste, and Cahuita, in the province of Limon. I hypothesize that women's status, reflecting gender differences in power distribution, is an important determinant of the type of union chosen. Women with a weaker "bargaining position" in their relationships with men (reflected in their socioeconomic status, children from previous unions, age, etc.) are more likely to enter consensual than legal unions, which offer less legal and financial protection. The weaker "bargaining position" of women in consensual unions in turn is likely to affect the "marital relationship" so that women in consensual unions may have less say in fertility decisions than their partners. The results show that while most respondents state that there are no differences between union types in terms of family obligations and responsibilities, women are nevertheless aware that consensual unions may end up providing them with little legal or financial support, and that they and their children risk being left on their own. The greater instability of the consensual union influences fertility in that women appear to use children to create a securer bond within such unions. Further work in this area would benefit from more research into the cultural context within which decisions regarding union formation are made and the constraints on union choice

Affect (linguistics) · Bargaining power · Context (archaeology) · Demographic economics · Economics · Fertility · Focus group · Geography · Labour economics · Marital status · Political science · Population · Position (finance) · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Wage · Demography · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges

  • Gender and Community Context

    Open Access•Marion W Carter•Sociological Forum•2004

  • Formation of cohabiting unions in Botswana

    Zitha Mokomane•Journal of Contemporary African…•2005

  • The marriage squeeze in Colombia, 1973-2005

    J H Jones, Brodie Ferguson•Biodemography and Social Biology•2006

  • Husbands and maternal health matters in rural Guatemala

    Open Access•Marion Carter•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • Stability of unions and fertility in Barbados

    Bali Ram, G Edward Ebanks•Social Biology•1973

  • The Family and Society in Nineteenth-Century Latin America

    Open Access•Elizabeth Kuznesof, Elizabeth Anne Kuznesof et al.•Journal of Family History•1985

  • Fertility and number of partnerships in Barbados

    G Edward Ebanks, P M George et al.•Population Studies•1974

  • The Control of Human Fertility in Jamaica

    Open Access•Mayone Stycos, Mayone J Stycos et al.•Population•1965

  • Family Structure in Jamaica. The Social Context of Reproduction

    Open Access•Judith Blake, Judith A Blake et al.•Population•1962

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año0,17
Intervalo de citas2002 - 2006 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae