Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Off-Duty Resilience

Reorienting Tourism, Leisure, and Recreation in the US Army Boss Program

Bibliographic Data

ID2995205
AuthorsDebbie Lisle (0000-0003-3413-5109, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume68
Issue3
Pages747-768
Publication date2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0678 • E-ISSN: 1080-6490
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/aq.2016.0061
OpenAlexW2522442578
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

Off-Duty Resilience:Reorienting Tourism, Leisure, and Recreation in the US Army BOSS Program Debbie Lisle (bio) Work Hard, Play Hard: BOSS and the Rebranding of Tourism, Recreation, and Leisure Military leaders have always understood that success on the battlefield requires the provision of recreation, relaxation, and leisure for active-duty soldiers. Certainly this includes moments of “down time” during tours of duty overseas (e.g., video games, fitness training, poker), but it also includes structured leave—or R&R—where soldiers depart from the battlefield for a relaxing vacation, an adventure holiday, or more recently, a short visit home. Critical examinations of R&R show how the off-duty time of soldiers is shaped by prevailing discourses of race, gender, class, and sexuality that are not that far removed from similar discourses operating on battlefields.1 In other words, the modes of differentiation enabling soldiers to demonize and kill enemies on the battlefield are translated through a tourist gaze enabling soldiers to exploit feminized, sexualized, and racially subservient others off the battlefield (e.g., hosts, guides, servants, cleaners, lovers, prostitutes). Indeed, the work of Cynthia Enloe clearly demonstrates that militarism, tourism, patriarchy, and racism have a long and entangled history.2 The present essay builds on those insights by critically examining how the US Army is assimilating tourism, leisure, and recreational practices within its force-wide Ready and Resilient campaign (R2), and seeks to show how this process constructs resilient soldiers against disengaged, vulnerable, abject, exotic, and servile others. The R2 campaign builds the “mental, physical, emotional, behavioral and spiritual resilience” of US Army forces to help them perform well in “environments of uncertainty and persistent danger.”3 To embed readiness and resilience across the “Total Army” (i.e., soldiers as well as their families and associated civilians), the US Army has developed comprehensive training programs to produce the “Total [End Page 747] Soldier.” These include increasing self-awareness and mindfulness, deterring high-risk behaviors, supporting healthy alternatives, encouraging leadership and initiative, and helping all soldiers “overcome setbacks, recover and grow from adversities and thrive on a sustained basis.”4 Part of this culture shift is transforming the familiar (and often violent, sexist, and racist) logics through which US soldiers have traditionally engaged with local populations outside US bases. Indeed, R2 helps the army reshape the off-duty military tourism that had caused so much bad press in previous decades (e.g., high-profile rape cases, militarized prostitution, racially motivated violence). What interests me is how the US Army’s supposedly ethical response to previous “bad behavior” (i.e., the R2 agenda) produces its own logics of asymmetry, hierarchy, and exclusion—many of which are enacted through the unexpected and often hidden practices of tourism, leisure, and recreation. To explore the role of off-duty time in the construction of resilience, this essay focuses on the US Army’s Better Opportunities for Single Soldiers (BOSS) program, which organizes officially sanctioned opportunities for tourism, leisure, and recreation both on and off military bases in the United States and abroad. The BOSS program was created in 1995 to “enhance the morale and welfare of single soldiers, increase retention and sustain combat readiness.”5 It is institutionally part of the army’s Family and Morale, Welfare and Recreation Programs (MWR) and organized around three platforms. The first, Quality of Life, aims to increase the well-being of all the army’s soldiers. It was initially envisioned as a forum for troops to address any difficulties with their living arrangements (e.g., dilapidated barracks, broken equipment), but very quickly soldiers pushed for well-being to include personal growth and career development. As a result, BOSS’s Quality of Life platform is now much more focused on cultivating leadership and providing life skills and career training across all ranks. The second BOSS platform, Community Service, includes volunteer and charity activities in local communities around Army bases worldwide. Community service has been central to the army’s efforts to repair relations with local communities damaged by high-profile cases of rape, harassment, and violence, and BOSS soldiers are strongly encouraged to participate in “community programs or projects that make a difference in the lives of

Adventure · Boss · Criminology · Duty · Political science · Recreation · Sociology · Tourism · Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking · Engineering · Gender Studies · History · Law · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development

  • Enabling Militarism? The Inclusion of Soldiers with Disabilities in the Israeli Military

    Open Access•James Eastwood•International Political Sociology•2019

  • Inventing our Selves

    Open Access•Nikolas Rose•Inventing Our Selves•1996

  • Resilience as embedded neoliberalism

    Open Access•Jonathan Joseph•Resilience•2013

  • Development of a pathway for children disclosing potential for self‐harm

    Open Access•Sujit Sivasundaram, C Hutchison et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The Neoliberal Subject

    David Chandler, J Reid•Neoliberal Subject•2016

  • Reimagining the American Pacific

    Open Access•Rob Wilson, Rob Wilson-undifferentiated•Reimagining the American Pacific•2000

  • Militarized Currents

    Cynthia Enloe, Setsu Shigematsu et al.•Militarized currents•2010

  • A critique of humanitarian reason

    Chioke A M I'Anson, Chioke I'Anson et al.•Journal of Global Ethics•2013

  • No Good Deed Goes Unrewarded

    Wanda Vrasti, Jean Michel Montsion•Global Society•2014

  • Inventing Ourselves

    Jonathan Simon, Nikolas Rose•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1998

  • Nature and the Godly Empire

    Andrew C Porter, A Porter•The English Historical Review•2006

  • The Island

    Open Access•C Minca•Tourist Studies•2009

  • Resilience as Enhancement

    Open Access•Alison Howell•Politics•2015

  • Resilience, war, and austerity

    Open Access•Alison Howell•Security Dialogue•2014

  • Tropic Knights and Hula Belles

    Carolyn O’dwyer•Journal for Cultural Research•2004

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae