Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Rhetorical Question, Summarization Frequency, and Argument Strength Effects on Recall

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3000234
AutoresJames M Munch, John L Swasy
Ano1988
Volume15
Fascículo1
Páginas69
Data de publicação1988-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/209146
OpenAlexW2004975657
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas11
Referências citadas8

Summarizing rhetorical questions were used in a sales presentation for a new product. In a high involvement setting, grammatical form, summarization frequency, and argument strength were manipulated. Unlike results of past studies, rhetoricals reduced argument recall. Furthermore, using more rhetoricals paired with strong arguments decreased recall, but using more rhetoricals with weak arguments did not. Message acceptance, thought verbalization, and self-reported distraction data were consistent with our recall findings

Argument (complex analysis) · Automatic summarization · Cognitive psychology · Distraction · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Presentation (obstetrics) · Recall · Rhetorical question · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Effects of Argument Structure and Affective Tagging on Product Attitude Formation

    James M Munch, Gregory W Boller et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1993

  • Enhancing and Measuring Consumers' Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads

    Deborah J Macinnis, Christine Moorman et al.•Journal of Marketing•1991

  • Some Functions of Rhetorical Questions in Lysias’ Forensic Orations

    Open Access•Edith Hall•Trends in Classics•2022

  • Is review visibility fostering helpful votes? The role of review rank and review characteristics in the adoption of information

    Open Access•Miriam Alzate, Marta Arce-Urriza et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • A Measure of Perceived Argument Strength

    Xiaoquan Zhao, Andrew A Strasser et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2011

  • Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks

    Open Access•Daniel J O’keefe•Communication Theory•2003

  • An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion

    John R Sparks, Charles S Areni et al.•Communication Monographs•1998

  • When do consumers buy online product reviews? Effects of review quality, product type, and reviewer’s photo

    Open Access•Eun-Ju Lee, Eun‐ju Lee et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2013

  • Undemocratic Discourse

    Open Access•John Gastil•Discourse & Society•1992

  • Questioning the Questions around Jesus's Authority in Mark 11

    Open Access•Michael R Whitenton•Religions•2023

  • Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures under Directed Processing versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising

    Edward F Mcquarrie, David Glen Mick•Journal of Consumer Research•2003

  • Levels of processing

    Open Access•Fergus I M Craik, Robert S Lockhart•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1972

  • Questions and question asking in verbal discourse

    Open Access•Greg P Kearsley•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•1976

  • Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda

    Richard E Petty, Gary L Wells et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1976

  • On so-called 'rhetorical' questions

    Open Access•Jurgen Schmidt-Radefeldt•Journal of Pragmatics•1977

  • The Effect of Numbers on the Route to Persuasion

    Richard F Yalch, Rebecca Elmore-Yalch•Journal of Consumer Research•1984

  • Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness

    Richard E Petty, John T Cacioppo et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•1983

  • Examining the Target of Receiver Elaborations

    John L Swasy, James M Munch•Journal of Consumer Research•1985

Obras citantes distintas11
Citações por ano0,31
Intervalo de citações1991 - 2024 (34)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 10
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae