Antipodean Audits
Neoliberalism, Illiberal Governments and Australian Universities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3032935 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margaret Jolly (0000-0003-3454-3436, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-47 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropology in Action (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0967-201X • E-ISSN: 1752-2285 |
| Publisher | Berghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3167/096720105780644317 |
| OpenAlex | W2039901542 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
This article explores neoliberalism in Australian universities, in the context of the politics of a higher education 'reform package' introduced by the Liberal-National Party Coalition presently in power in federal government. I focus attention on the relationship between the broader national environment and the local university configuration at the Australian National University and the dialectic between university academics and students as objects of bureaucratic practices and self-auditing subjects in these new modalities of power. I situate the Australian experience in broader global debates about neoliberalism and universities and earlier ethnographies of audit cultures
Audit · Bureaucracy · Context (archaeology · Dialectic · Economics · Government (linguistics · Governmentality · Higher education · Management · Neoliberalism (international relations · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Higher Education Governance and Development · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Law · Public Administration
Putting a stake in the ground
Foundational principles for the academic profession in the context of greater systemic accountability
What is wrong with ethics review, the impact on teaching anthropology, and how to fix it
Ethics review regimes and Australian anthropology
Ethnographers’ Experiences of Institutional Ethics Oversight
Disrupting paradise
| Citations per year | 0.4 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |