Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bilingualism and text edition

Bibliographic Data

ID3043129
AuthorsM Sipos (0000-0001-5269-7784, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume8
Issue1
Pages86-97
Publication date2018-04-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of Ugric studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2220-4156 • E-ISSN: 2587-9766
PublisherOb-Ugric Institute of Applied Researches and Development (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.30624/2220-4156-2018-8-1-86-97
OpenAlexW2797322515
LanguageEN
References cited6

Introduction: the present paper focuses on the practice of editing texts before the formation of the study of bilingualism, by means of a representative example of a Šerkaly Khanty chrestomathy.Objective: the theory and practice of every field of science are continuously developing and refining, due to, among other things, the appearance of new research areas that may enrich the methodology of the related disciplines with many useful aspects and considerations.Research materials: the present case study is intended to illustrate that, accordingly, in Uralic studies, the principles of text edition before the rise of documentary linguistics and investigations in bilingualism were considerably different from today's expectations.Results and novelty of the research: the paper focuses on the syntactic differences between two versions of one and the same text, which was produced by a bilingual speaker.The syntactically modified excerpts were published by Wolfgang Steinitz himself in 1950, in his Šerkaly Khanty chrestomathy, whereas the whole text became available in a posthumous volume of Steinitz's heritage in 1989, unchanged.Khanty word order is traditionally considered verb final (SOV, SXV).By going through the modified clauses, it is shown that the proportion of non-verb-final sentences was radically decreased during the editing process, i.e. in the chrestomathy, numerous clauses were adjusted to the expected pattern by modifying its structure.Furthermore, the excerpts published in the chrestomathy were selected from sections exhibiting a relatively low number of SVO / SVX sentences.All this indicates that in the middle of the 20th century, i.e. before the formation of contact linguistics, the authenticity of a text that bears the consequences of Khanty-Russian bilingualism was not considered of primary importance

Linguistics · Neuroscience of multilingualism · Novelty · Sociology · Syntax · Verb · Word order · Computer Science · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistic research and analysis · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Norwegian language in America

    Einar Ingvald Haugen•The Norwegian language in America•1953

  • The Handbook of Language Contact

    Open Access•Raymond Hickey•The Handbook of Language Contact•2010

  • Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics

    Sarah Grey Thomason, Terrence Kaufman•Language contact, creolization,…•1988

  • Ostjakische Grammatik und Chrestomathie

    Wolfgang Steinitz•Ostjakische Grammatik und…•1950

  • Literate and Illiterate Speech

    Leonard Bloomfield•American Speech•1927

  • The Analysis of Linguistic Borrowing

    Einar Haugen•Language•1950

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae