Friend or foe? When political elites evaluate foreign leaders
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3062286 |
|---|---|
| Authors | José Manuel Rivas (0000-0002-5115-8022, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano), Asbel Bohigues (0000-0002-9875-7743, Universitat de València) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 109 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0102-6909 • E-ISSN: 1806-9053 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/3710904/2022 |
| OpenAlex | W4312891663 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0102-69092022000200509 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 46 |
Leaders are themselves key actors in international relations; in recent years, Hugo Chávez and Pope Francis have had an expressive impact beyond their respective traditional influence areas. Why do such leaders display this kind of popularity? More importantly, how do political elites perceive them? This paper aims to identify, employing evidence from eighteen Latin American parliaments, what drives political elite evaluations of a variety of notorious leaders in the last decade. To determine which factors are behind their evaluations, we rely on a friend-foe approach of politics, as measured by the ideological distance between the legislator her/himself and the leader. The results point that this friend-foe logic is the main predictor when it comes to the evaluation of elites by elites in the international arena
Elite · Ideology · International relations · Latin Americans · Legislator · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Popularity · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America
Elites and Democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe
A Unified Theory of Voting
A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization.
An economic theory of democracy
Degrees of Democracy
Political Leaders and Democratic Elections
Politics and Political Elites in Latin America
The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior
A Data-Driven Voter Guide for U.S. Elections
Multilateralism and the Use of Force
Perceiving Rogue States
The Effects of Candidate Age in the 2008 Presidential Election
The importance of presidential leadership for Brazilian foreign policy
Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies
Postcommunist Elites and Democracy in Eastern Europe
Free trade agreements and regional alliances
Understanding Alba
Parliamentary Elites in Central and Eastern Europe
Recovering a Basic Space from Elite Surveys
Public Opinion and Foreign Policy
The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate
El análisis de los diputados latinoamericanos en el contexto de los estudios sobre la clase política. Características, objetivos y estrategias de investigación
Americans, Not Partisans
El apoyo a la democracia en los parlamentos latinoamericanos. Análisis del demócrata ambivalente
A Cross-Cutting Calm
How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization
The Contingent Effects of Candidate Sex on Voter Choice
Using Joint Scaling Methods to Study Ideology and Representation
Political Parties, Foreign Policy and Ideology
Dimensionland
Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model
A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis
A Categorization Theory of Spatial Voting
Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer
Don’t Cry for me “Argenchina
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Presidents, Legislators, and Foreign Policy in Latin America
Republican Elites and Foreign Policy Attitudes
Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization
Distance versus Direction
A Directional Theory of Issue Voting
Unidade partidária e política externa na América Latina
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |