The Neo-Slave Novel and Progressive Eugenics in Colson Whitehead's The Underground Railroad
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3136333 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberto Ferreira Junior (0000-0003-3759-0123, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 393-414 |
| Publication date | 2022-09-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Aletria Revista de Estudos de Literatura (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1679-3749 • E-ISSN: 2317-2096 |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.35699/2317-2096.2022.29105 |
| OpenAlex | W4411590332 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Colson Whitehead has been noted for writing books that migrate from one literary genre to another exhibiting then a penchant for genre eclecticism. In light of that, this study proposes that his book The Underground Railroad (2016) should be classified as a neo-slave novel due to its autonomy in recreating antebellum slavery. Besides, in so doing, Whitehead revisits specific shameful historical events represented by his country's long use of racist medical procedures such as progressive eugenics. These events have been largely forgotten by most Americans and, thus, by recuperating such shameful past Whitehead indicates that progressive eugenics not only reproduced the same racist ideology under slavery but the writer also suggests the possibility that similar medical practices might still be in use today albeit with different names. In pursuing this analysis, the article turns to authors such as Bernard Bell (1987), Toni Morrison (1995), Ashraf H. A. Rushdy (1999), Valerie Smith (2007) as well as interviews with Whitehead
Eugenics · Humanities · Political science · Gothic Literature and Media Analysis · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |