Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rough Draft

Cold War Military Manpower Policy and the Origins of Vietnam-Era Draft Resistance

Bibliographic Data

ID3136513
AuthorsDavid E Settje (Downer's Grove, Illinois, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume107
Issue4
Pages1051-1052
Publication date2021-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jahist/jaaa559
OpenAlexW3135060591
LanguageEN

With a conflicted history, the United States drafts people during war, has prided itself on voluntary forces during peace, yet leans heavily on patriotism to obtain these volunteers and enforce draft obedience. Almost every draft contained resistance, and the Cold War created a continuous draft. Amy J. Rutenberg corrects previous assumptions about the draft since World War II and demonstrates a slow change over time in how Americans came to avoid mandatory military service. While most studies of Vietnam War–era draft resistance begin in the 1960s, Rutenberg traces it to World War II and reveals that draft avoidance built over three decades rather than popping up because of U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia. Rutenberg roots her study in exhaustive research at numerous archives. She details how men avoided the draft during World War II, despite mythologies about a “good war” and the greatest generation, with deferments such as for child rearing. This behavior intensified into the 1950s, when the government needed fewer soldiers. Government officials altered policy to expand deferments based on “domestic service,” such as fatherhood and scientific research, to assist Cold War ideologies. Thus, by the 1960s, mostly white, middle- and upper-class men already avoided conscription, so the Vietnam War exacerbated established practices rather than creating them. Rutenberg also exposes how class and race prejudices grew as a result. The War on Poverty met this draft evolution with a belief that military service offered hope for those locked in poverty and therefore disproportionately affected African Americans. Changes in notions of patriotic masculinity also shaped these conversations. And Rutenberg corrects Lewis B. Hershey's history of presiding over the draft, from George Q. Flynn's interpretation that he managed it to maintain his power to showing how Hershey shaped it based on changing societal norms, military needs, and directives from higher-ups

Conscientious objector · Economic history · Government (linguistics · Military operations other than war · Military service · Political science · Resistance (ecology · Spanish Civil War · Vietnam War · World War II · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · History · Law · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae