Byzantine Parades of Infamy through an Animal Lens
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3137156 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maroula Perisanidi (0000-0002-7077-8497, University of Leeds, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2021-02-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History Workshop Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1363-3554 • E-ISSN: 1477-4569 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/hwj/dbaa019 |
| OpenAlex | W3134157481 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
In this article, I discuss humiliation parades as described by eleventh-century Byzantine historians, focusing on the role of mules and donkeys in them. More specifically, I examine how the presence of these equids could change the meaning of a scene in the works of Michael Attaleiates, John Skylitzes, and Michael Psellos. I argue that, as the social and religious connotations of mules and donkeys interacted with the social and religious status of their riders, humiliation could turn to humility and emasculation to masculinity, transforming the animals themselves into carriers of political rhetoric. When reading these scenes we need to consider whether our rider is a man or a woman, a cleric or a layman, a general or scholar, but also what kind of equid they are riding and how that might be juxtaposed with other animals in the text. In addition to emphasizing the role of animals in Byzantine political life, I consider the animals' own experience of these parades, attempting to reconstruct something of their sense of the world with the help of modern veterinary science
Aesthetics · Art · Byzantine architecture · Epistemology · Football · Humiliation · Humility · Linguistics · Literature · Masculinity · Meaning (existential) · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Rhetoric · Sociology · Byzantine Studies and History · Classics · Culinary Culture and Tourism · Eurasian Exchange Networks · Gender Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |