Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What If the Black Forest Owned Itself? A Constitutional Property Law Perspective on Rights of Nature

Bibliographic Data

ID3137510
AuthorsBjörn Hoops (0000-0002-1073-8004, University of Groningen, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume11
Issue3
Pages475-500
Publication date2022-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransnational Environmental Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2047-1025 • E-ISSN: 2047-1033
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s2047102522000322
OpenAlexW4296463535
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited7

Ownership has been a key tool in the exploitation of nature for centuries. However, ownership could also shield natural entities from extraction and pollution if it were vested in them, rather than in humans or corporations. Through a case study of German constitutional property law, this article examines the normative content of this constitutional right. It argues that in owning themselves, natural entities would have numerous tools to fend off human interference with their self-determination. Constitutional property law would require any harmful activity affecting the natural entity to be based upon legislation and necessary to achieve a public purpose. The natural entity would enjoy broader access to justice. Courts would also often award appropriate remedies; where the natural entity would be awarded only compensation, this would be unsatisfactory because money cannot replace nature. The article finds that constitutional property law offers the potential for further protection from human interference, which has not been realized because of anthropocentric value judgments prevalent in German legal doctrine. Ecocentric approaches to ownership and invalidity as a standard remedy would play an important role in unlocking the full potential of ownership for environmental protection

Anthropocentrism · Business · Common law · Constitutional law · Doctrine · Economic Justice · Environmental law · Geography · Law and economics · Legal doctrine · Legislation · Normative · Political science · Property rights · Sociology · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental law and policy · International Environmental Law and Policies · Law

  • The Methodologies of Transnational Environmental Law Scholarship

    Open Access•Thijs Etty, Josephine Van Zeben et al.•Transnational Environmental Law•2023

  • Public nuisance for private persons

    Hanoch Dagan, Avihay Dorfman•University of Toronto Law Journal•2024

  • Rights of Nature on the Island of Ireland

    Open Access•Rachel Killean, J Gilbert et al.•Transnational Environmental Law•2024

  • New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature

    Open Access•Susana Borrás, Susana Borràs Pentinat•Transnational Environmental Law•2016

  • Conceptualizing Human Stewardship in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Stefan Knauß•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

  • A Comparative Analysis of the Provisions of German Origin in the Interim Bill of Rights

    Johan De Waal•South African Journal on Human…•1995

  • Rights of Nature, Legal Personality, and Indigenous Philosophies

    Open Access•Mihnea Tănăsescu•Transnational Environmental Law•2020

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae