Marginal to the Revolution
The Curious Relationship between Economics and the Behavioral Sciences Movement in Mid-Twentieth-Century America
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3137934 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jefferson Pooley (0000-0002-3674-1930), Mark Solovey |
| Ano | 2010 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Fascículo | Suppl_1 |
| Páginas | 199-233 |
| Data de publicação | 2010-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | History of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0018-2702 • E-ISSN: 1527-1919 |
| Editora | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00182702-2009-077 |
| OpenAlex | W2142251888 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 18 |
| Referências citadas | 40 |
American economics largely ignored the behavioral sciences movement in the decade after World War II. The social scientists who adopted the "behavioral sciences" moniker were self-consciously nomothetic, fond of mathematics and statistical analysis, and eager to stand close to the natural sciences. The same was true of leading postwar economists, and yet they alone opted out, with only a few exceptions. We explore this divide as it emerged in the early development of the Ford Foundation's Behavioral Sciences Program (BSP). We describe early efforts to incorporate economics into the BSP in a substantial manner, premised on the belief that economic analysis could be greatly strengthened by the behavioral science orientation, with its emphasis on rigorous empirical study of actual human behavior. Yet these efforts failed, in large part because economists, especially those commonly labeled "neoclassical," were uninterested, skeptical, and even dismissive of what they took to be an immature and faddish initiative. Gaps in postwar prestige and clashing models of social science contributed to the Ford Foundation's decision to fund economics on a separate track from the other social sciences. In our account, the adoption of the "behavioral sciences" terminology in tandem with the movement's institutional anchoring at the Ford Foundation thus reflected and widened the split between economists and their counterparts in the other social sciences
Behavioral economics · Behavioural sciences · Economics · Epistemology · Nomothetic · Nomothetic and idiographic · Political science · Positive economics · Prestige · Skepticism · Social science · Sociology · Terminology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Economic Theory and Institutions · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
Of Alcohol, Apes, and Taxes
What are behavioral sciences? Epistemic boundaries and paradigms from a Delphi study
Paradigm Change or Assimilation? The Case of Behavioral Economics
Cash Is Not King
Calling the Social Sciences Names
Behavioral economics and the nature of neoclassical paradigm
Framing psychology as a discipline (1950–1999)
The rise and fall of behaviorism
Knowledge, behaviour, and policy
La mobilité disciplinaire des chercheurs au cœur de l’économie comportementale
Tracing Mathematical Economics
A Sense of Mission
No More Than Exchanging Tools
Economics in the Mirror of Anthropology
Measuring the Economizing Mind in the 1940s and 1950s
A forgotten social science? Creating a place for linguistics in the historical dialogue
Senator Fred Harris's National Social Science Foundation Proposal
Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior
From Whirlwind to Mitre
Psychologists on the March
From Higher Aims to Hired Hands
Economics and Sociology
A Perilous Progress
"Truth Is Our Weapon"
Industrialism and Industrial Man in Retrospect
Campaigns of Truth
When Black Boxes Clash
The Need for Increasing Convergence of Management Theory and Practice
Research on the American Soldier as a Career Contingency
The Human Sciences in Cold War America
Toward a general theory for the behavioral sciences
Research planning at the frontiers of science
The psychological and social sciences in the national military establishment
The Transformation of U.S. Economics, 1920–1960, Viewed through a Survey of Journal Articles
The Rand Corporation
Riding natural scientists' coattails onto the endless frontier
Arthur F. Bentley and the foundations of behavioral science
Stabilizing American Society
Behavioral Economics
The Patrons of Economics in a Time of Transformation
Organizing Knowledge and Behavior at Yale's Institute of Human Relations
What is "behavioral science?" - notes toward a history
Organizing intelligence
The emergence of sociology from political economy in the United States
The Development of the Neoclassical Tradition in Labor Economics
Patrons of the Revolution
Economics and Sociology
| Obras citantes distintas | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |