Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tripartitism in the National War Labor Board

Bibliographic Data

ID3139575
AuthorsRobert G Dixon (0000-0003-2616-8250, corresponding author)
Year1949
Volume2
Issue3
Pages372
Publication date1949-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIndustrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2519075
OpenAlexW4236209291, W2061485361
LanguageEN
Citations received1

One of the unique contributions the National War Labor Board made to the growing body of data in the field of labor-management relations resulted from its experience as a tripartite organization. Under this arrangement representatives of labor, management, and the public were given equal voting strength on a board that had semicompulsive powers in regard to labor disputes. Although the Board relied on a no-strike, no-lockout pledge, and its orders were merely advisory to the President, the prospect of coercive action by the President in support of the orders virtually made the Board a tripartite compulsory arbitration tribunal. Prior to this time, tripartite boards, in labor relations or in general administration, had been confined largely to an advisory and voluntary role. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)

Administration (probate law) · Arbitration · Courtesy · Labor relations · Pledge · Political science · Tribunal · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration

  • A U.S. Tripartite Experiment in the Kennedy Administration

    Yongwoo Jeung•Polity•2019

Citations per year0.14
Citation span2019 - 2019 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae