The Gospel and the Church
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3142337 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cornelius Ernst (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1962 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 505-506 |
| Pages | 301-313 |
| Publication date | 1962-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Blackfriars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1754-2014 • E-ISSN: 2977-0580 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1741-2005.1962.tb00836.x |
| OpenAlex | W1973918176 |
| Language | EN |
It has been widely acknowledged that Dr Hans Kiing's The Council and Reunion (fluently translated by Cecily Hastings in a Sheed and Ward Stagbook) is one of the most important of the vast flood of publications released by Pope John XXIII's announcement of his intention to summon an ecumenical council. Its reception has been generally favourable, even rapturous (see The Clergy Review, January 1962, p. 33); but there seems to have been a marked disinclination to enter into detailed discussion. What is particularly unfortunate about this is that the book has become to some extent the manifesto of a party; there is sufficient evidence, though not in print, so far as I know, that a resolute opposition to the book among certain Catholics has been able to take shape in silence. It seems to me that silent opposition and vocal enthusiasm form a particularly vicious combination; and surely the best way of releasing what tension there is is to look at Rung's book critically.Criticism ordinarily implies detachment; yet it might be claimed that here if anywhere detachment is out of place. What could demand a more passionate commitment than the reform of the Church? The critical detachment which we shall try to practise here, then, is not a detachment from the profound reforming purpose of Kiing's book or indeed of the Council itself; but it will be a serious attempt to find a standpoint which is neither simply 'conservative' nor simply 'progressive', nor for that matter simply 'middle of the road
Art · Citation · Gospel · Library science · Theology · Classics · Computer Science · Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|