Debunking the I above YOU illusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3144255 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marie-Odile Junker |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 35-50 |
| Publication date | 2011-04-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | LIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1678-0531 • E-ISSN: 2177-7160 |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.20396/liames.v0i11.1495 |
| OpenAlex | W2240520732 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 23 |
There is a long tradition in placing I above YOU in linguistics and grammar. In our Western grammatical terminology, I is the "first person". In the universal scale of agentivity, or "universal person hierarchy", I is placed before YOU. The goal of this paper is to examine the proof for ordering I and YOU in such a fashion. The universal character of local person marking in human languages, and existing proposals concerning the person hierarchy are reviewed. The kind of grammatical phenomena governed by the so-called "universal hierarchy": split ergativity, inverse systems, and pronominal marking, are discussed. First, we show that there are languages whose grammatical phenomena are governed by the other order, with YOU above I. Looking for the possibility that two person hierarchies share room within world languages, we then turn to the facts that support placing I above YOU, and demonstrate that this proof is non-existent. The egocentric perspective belongs to linguistics, and to certain habits of a Western school of thought, not to natural languages. The data examined here also shows that there are no languages where split ergativity or the inverse system would operate from a hierarchy placing 3rd persons above 2nd or 1st , thus confirming a 2, 1>3 hierarchy. As far as a hierarchy between singular persons or Speech Acts participants is concerned, the one for which there is clear evidence is the one where YOU outranks I: 2>I
Grammar · Hierarchy · Linguistic universal · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Terminology · Universal Grammar · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence · History · Philosophy
The second persons is rightly so called
Ergativity
Agency, Inversion, and Thematic Alignment in Ojibwe
Case marking and human nature
Plains Cree
Who are we? The natural semantics of pronouns
Focus, obviation, and word order in East Cree
Pragmatic Skewing in 1 ↔ 2 Pronominal Combinations in Native American Languages
Split Ergativity in Cavineña
Amazonian Linguistics
An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns
Semantics
Ergativity
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |