Capitals, occupational fields and consumption preferences

An analysis of the British family expenditure survey (2009-2016)

Bibliographic Data

ID3145588
AuthorsKarina Pavlisa (0000-0002-6223-895X, University of Bristol, corresponding author), Peter M Scott (Henley Business School, University of Reading, UK), Peter Scott (0000-0003-1230-9040, University of Reading)
Year2023
Volume71
Issue5
Pages1191-1212
Publication date2023-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Sociological Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0261 • E-ISSN: 1467-954X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00380261221093405
OpenAlexW4285392709
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited42

Relationships between occupational membership and personal consumption have long been an important area of social analysis. Occupational groups represent important contexts of consumption, where individuals' advantages and resources are accumulated and often impose reproduction of field-specific practices and patterns of behaviour. Drawing on Bourdieu's conceptualization of capitals and using the British family expenditure survey, we explore consumption of capital-signalling goods across particular occupational groups within the professional-managerial 'class', associated with different capital structures, and demonstrate distinct spending strategies geared to the pursuit of occupational advancement. We examine consumption behaviours for six managerial/professional groups - business professionals; technical professionals; educational professionals; higher, and lower, private sector management; and public sector management. We test whether distinct patterns of 'capital-signalling' consumption can be identified and find significant effects of capital composition on presentational, socialization-related and informational expenditure, consistent with our hypotheses. We argue that consumption is a part of the signalling strategy of career agents, and between-occupational contrasts in capital-signalling expenditures are important but overlooked measures of capitals in cultural class analysis. We conclude that granular analysis of consumption patterns is important for revealing differences in accumulation of non-economic capitals across occupational groups, with significant implications for understanding inequality and class divisions

Consumption (sociology) · Demographic economics · Economics · Social class · Social science · Socialization · Sociology · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Capital and Networks