Arqueología pública y cartografías participativas
Institucionalidad y resignificaciones locales del patrimonio arqueológico del Sígsig, Ecuador (2022-2024)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3172180 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Miguel Ángel Novillo Verdugo (0000-0002-3823-8458, University of Cuenca), Estefanía Priscila Palacios Tamayo (0000-0001-5389-4675, University of Cuenca) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Issue | 56 |
| Pages | 79-104 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Antípoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2011-4273 • E-ISSN: 1900-5407 |
| Publisher | Universidad de los Andes (PUBLISHER • VE) |
| DOI | 10.7440/antipoda56.2024.04 |
| OpenAlex | W4400369664 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 11 |
The objective of the article is to identify the perceptions, meanings, and resignifications that the inhabitants of Sígsig canton, Azuay province (Ecuador), assign to archaeological heritage. It also attempts to explain how these ways of understanding and using such heritage come into conflict and friction when managed exclusively within a legal and institutional framework. To analyze the ambiguities arising from the dichotomy between public management and the local populations' uses and meanings of heritage, this study employs the theoretical frameworks of public archaeology and the methodological approach of participatory cartographies. By analyzing national and local heritage regulations and conducting interviews and mappings with actors from the educational, political, and general society sectors, it is suggested that institutional management views heritage as an identity, historical, and economic resource through tourism. Additionally, this management is characterized by a fiscalizing, regulatory, and sanctioning logic, while the inhabitants understand, incorporate, and use archaeological objects and vestiges in their daily lives. This usage fosters a direct connection with oral traditions, intangible aspects, and, above all, with nature. Thus, frictions were identified between the social and political uses of heritage, which regularly involve themes such as gold, mining, and water, within a framework of collective imaginaries and discourses
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Citizen journalism · Cultural heritage · Cultural heritage management · Economy · Ethnology · Geography · Heritage tourism · Humanities · Identity (music) · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Tourism · Archaeology and Cultural Heritage · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Law
La cartografía participativa como propuesta teórico-metodológica para una arqueología del paisaje latinoamericana. Un ejemplo desde los Valles Calchaquíes (Argentina)
Participatory Mapping of Community Lands and Hunting Yields among the Buglé of Western Panama
Presentación Del Dossier El Patrimonio Cultural Urbano
Pensar la arqueología desde el sur
Walking the line
Arqueología pública
Territorialidad, mapeo participativo y política sobre los recursos naturales
Cuerpo y sentidos
Cuerpo-Territorio
Lo "Público" en La Arqueología Argentina
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |