Microdebris analysis in Early Bronze Age Mesopotamian households
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3178569 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lynn Rainville (University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 74 |
| Issue | 284 |
| Pages | 291-292 |
| Publication date | 2000-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0003598x00059305 |
| OpenAlex | W2462874941 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 6 |
I am interested in the daily activities of the non-Blites to understand ancient Mesopotamian society.Analysing the activities performed within thehouses of the non-6lites is the first step in definingthe social and economic differentiation amonghouseholds and, in turn, a better understanding ofthe role of these households within ancient communities.1 analyse activity areas using a relativelynew method - micro-debris analysis - which analysessmall artefactual and ecofactual remains(Fladmark 1982; Rosen 1989; Matthews 1995).In my dissertation, 365 sediment samples (10litres each) were taken from over 20 structures.The rationale for sampling deposits and countingand weighing the small remains found withinthe earthen matrix is based on a model of depositionalforces. Site formation theorists suggestthat macro-debris left by daily activities are usuallydisturbed and often discarded far from theloci of the original activity. Whereas the large findsmay be scavenged, discarded, or curated in periodsof abandonment, smaller debris is often sweptinto corners or trampled into the surface of afloor. These small items are more likely thanlarge items to remain where they were droppeddue to the difficulty in removing small debriswith traditional cleaning methods (Schiffer 1983;Dunnell & Stein 1989). My research focused onthe analysis of artefacts under 1 cm in dimensionfound in occupational surfaces and featuresin order to define activity areas at severalEarly Bronze Age (c. 3100-1900 BC) sites insoutheastern Turkey
Abandonment (legal) · Ancient history · Archaeology · Bronze · Bronze Age · Debris · Geography · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Excavations at Tell Brak 2001-2002
Peering Into the Dusty Corners
Cycles of Civilization in Northern Mesopotamia, 4400–2000 BC
Microartifact Analysis
Sampling Matters
Spatial and Temporal Variation in Mesopotamian Agricultural Practices in the Khabur Basin, Syrian Jazira
Studying lithic microdebitage with a dynamic image particle analyzer
Macrodebitage Writ Small? Studying Stoneknapping with Experimental Archaeology, Dynamic Image Analysis, and Statistics
Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük
Domestic economies and regional transition
Scaling Up, Scaling Down
Redefining lithic microdebitage with experimental archaeology
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2026 (25) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |