Worldviews Complexity in Covid-19 Times

Australian Media Representations of Religion, Spirituality and Non-Religion in 2020

Dados Bibliográficos

ID3187995
AutoresA Halafoff (0000-0003-4274-5951, Deakin University, autor correspondente), Emily Marriott (0000-0002-3272-333X, Deakin University), Geraldine Smith (0000-0002-3418-3859, University of Tasmania), Enqi Weng (0000-0001-6300-7304, Deakin University), G Bouma (0000-0003-2093-5738, Monash University)
Ano2021
Volume12
Fascículo9
Páginas682
Data de publicação2021-08-26
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoReligions (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
EditoraMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel12090682
OpenAlexW3195261289
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas13
Referências citadas19

In 2020, as infections of COVID-19 began to rise, Australia, alongside many other nations, closed its international borders and implemented lockdown measures across the country. The city of Melbourne was hardest hit during the pandemic and experienced the strictest and longest lockdown worldwide. Religious and spiritual groups were especially affected, given the prohibition of gatherings of people for religious services and yoga classes with a spiritual orientation, for example. Fault lines in socio-economic differences were also pronounced, with low-wage and casual workers often from cultural and religious minorities being particularly vulnerable to the virus in their often precarious workplaces. In addition, some religious and spiritual individuals and groups did not comply and actively resisted restrictions at times. By contrast, the pandemic also resulted in a positive re-engagement with religion and spirituality, as lockdown measures served to accelerate a digital push with activities shifting to online platforms. Religious and spiritual efforts were initiated online and offline to promote wellbeing and to serve those most in need. This article presents an analysis of media representations of religious, spiritual and non-religious responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Melbourne, Australia, from January to August 2020, including two periods of lockdown. It applies a mixed-method quantitative and qualitative thematic approach, using targeted keywords identified in previous international and Australian media research. In so doing, it provides insights into Melbourne's worldview complexity, and also of the changing place of religion, spirituality and non-religion in the Australian public sphere in COVID times

Casual · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public sphere · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Spirituality · Thematic analysis · Gender Studies · Law · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Medicine · Religion and Society Interactions · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence