Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Golden Wildebeest Days

Fragmentation and Value in South Africa's Wildlife Economy After Apartheid

Bibliographic Data

ID3200437
AuthorsDavid Bunn (0000-0002-3072-7599, University of British Columbia), Bram Büscher (0000-0001-8902-1745, Wageningen University), Melissa R Mchale (0000-0001-7300-2988, University of British Columbia), Mary L Cadenasso (0000-0002-6521-067X, University of California, Davis), Daniel L Childers (0000-0003-3904-0803, Arizona State University), Steward T A Pickett (0000-0002-1899-976X, Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies), Louie Rivers (0000-0001-7240-6710, North Carolina State University), Louise Swemmer (0000-0002-4368-9229, South African National Parks)
Year2022
Volume48
Issue6
Pages1013-1035
Publication date2022-11-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Southern African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0305-7070 • E-ISSN: 1465-3893
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03057070.2022.2145776
OpenAlexW4319840219
LanguageEN
Citations received1

There are renewed global efforts to make wildlife conservation the foundation for broad-based economic development. This article looks at these tendencies in the 'Kruger to Canyons' (K2C) biosphere region in South Africa, encompassing the Kruger National Park and adjacent settlement areas and reserves. Various forms of the wildlife economy have a long history in this region. However, it is increasingly posited as a preternatural means for creating jobs. We chronicle the growth of the wildlife economy from its apartheid heyday to the present, showing its fundamental dependence on the ecological and political fragmentation of space. More generally, these biopolitical divisions are part of a broad contestation of wildlife value, organised around changing regimes of protected area enclosure and the spacing of human and non-human life. Despite recent claims by the South African conservation industry that it is demolishing fences and increasing habitat connectivity, political territorialisation and ecological fragmentation continue to be important means of securing profit and reducing perceived risk. While the contradictions of this dynamic have now become acute through the emergence of the rhino-poaching crisis, the growth of that violent industry, we conclude, should not be seen as the negative inversion of a legal wildlife economy. Instead, both the legal and the illegal wildlife economies are manifestations of the same underlying problems: ill-conceived attempts at agrarian reform; the persistent influence of an older veterinary wildlife assemblage; the continued role of the rural poor as an enabling but unacknowledged buffer between development and wildlife

Agrarian society · Agriculture · Development economics · Economics · Economy · Geography · North American Model of Wildlife Conservation · Poaching · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Exploring Community-Based Wildlife Tourism from an Environmental Justice Perspective

    Open Access•Lizzy Van Megen, Brandon P Anthony•Human Ecology•2024

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae