Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Beautiful Madness

Privilege, the Machine Question and Industrial Development in Normandy in 1789

Bibliographic Data

ID3201394
AuthorsJames Horn (Manhattan College, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume217
Issue1
Pages149-185
Publication date2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePast & Present (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-2746 • E-ISSN: 1477-464X
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pastj/gts010
OpenAlexW2114012315
LanguageEN
Citations received4

In the 1780s privileges — widely held special exemptions from France’s complex system of economic regulations — obsessed the political elites of the province of Normandy. A number of influential pamphlets informed by economic considerations criticized the inequities and inefficiencies stemming from privilege in favour of sweeping changes in the productive role of privilege. The polemics concerning privilege in Normandy are familiar to historians, not least because they fuelled political discontent throughout France. But the looming presence of 1789 has obscured why the issue of privilege was so important in this province and clouds the pivotal impact that the evolution of Norman views on privilege had on the outbreak of the French Revolution. The missing piece of the puzzle concerns the royal government’s use of privilege as a tool of economic development to nurture the birth of machine production in Normandy. Privilege was the basis of the society of orders in Bourbon France. The privileges of the nobility, clergy and king formed the apex of a structure that reached into most provinces and affected nearly all cities and towns, through the urban occupations that formed corporations (occupational groupings or trade guilds). Critics such as the abbé Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès, whose An Essay on Privileges helped to crystallize public sentiment, repeated the common assertion that privilege was ‘a dispensation or exemption in favour of him who possesses it and a discouragement to those who do not’.1

Government (linguistics) · Jurisdiction · Political science · Politics · Privilege (computing) · Sociology · European Political History Analysis · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · Law · Philosophy

  • Rural Luddism and the makeshift economy of the Nottinghamshire framework knitters

    Matthew Roberts•Social History•2017

  • Patriotic natural history and sericulture in the French Enlightenment (1730–1780)

    Open Access•Etienne Stockland•Archives of Natural History•2017

  • Bankers, Finance Capital and the French Revolutionary Terror (1791–94)

    Henry Heller•Historical Materialism•2014

  • The Economics of Guilds

    Open Access•Sheilagh Ogilvie•The Journal of Economic…•2014

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2014 - 2017 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae