A World in a Grain of Sand
The Book of Nature and Restoration Theology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3204145 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aaron Robert Kelson (Mesabi Range College) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 937 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel12110937 |
| OpenAlex | W3209213027 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
Augustine (354-430) is considered to be the first Christian scholar to refer to the Creation's witness of God as the Book of Nature. For centuries, in conjunction with scripture, the Book of Nature was considered in Christianity to be a second witness of God. These two witnesses were also stressed in Judaism, beginning with the Torah's account of the Creation. The Book of Nature was prominent in Islam as the faith emerged in the 7th century. However, by the 16th century reliance on the Book of Nature began to wane for all these traditions as allegorical interpretation of the natural world gave way to scriptural literalism, partially in response to emerging scientific advances. The appearance of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as a self-identified restoration theology in the early nineteenth century should arguably reopen and clarify the Book of Nature in the faith. However, contemporary Latter-day Saint hermeneutics have limited the Creation's status in the faith's ontology. The Latter-day Saint theological ideal, supported by the scriptural canon of the faith, counters contemporary neglect, inviting greater attention to and respect for the Book of Nature among the Latter-day Saint community
Art · Art history · Christian theology · Christianity · Faith · Hermeneutics · Judaism · Literature · SAINT · Theology · Witness · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · History · Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Religious studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|