Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Carver, Cavell, and the Uncanniness of the Ordinary

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3205099
AutoresNiklas Forsberg (0000-0001-9129-5534, autor de correspondencia)
Año2018
Volumen49
Número1
Páginas1-22
Fecha de publicación2018-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNew Literary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X
EditorialProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/nlh.2018.0000
OpenAlexW2801919384
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas6

A predominant misunderstanding of the philosophical importance of paying attention to our ordinary language is that it supplies us with a standard of correctness. In contrast to this view, it is arguedhere that everyday and ordinary language are so difficult to bring into view and that this is something both J. L. Austin and Ludwig Wittgenstein maintained as well. It is precisely the failure to notice these kinds of difficulties that often leads philosophers into philosophical problems and metaphysical speculation. The philosopher who most clearly has stressed that "the everyday" is something difficult to get into view is Stanley Cavell, and he has also linked the concept of the ordinary to the Freudian concept of the uncanny. The idea of the "Unheimlich" contains the suggestion that there is something uncanny about that which is open to view because it is open to view. Thus, if the real problem with "ordinary language" is that we philosophers take ourselves to be in full command of our everyday language already and need not think more about it, then a presentation of our own familiar language that presents the familiar as something unfamiliar, the homely as strange, might be exactly what philosophy needs. This is one thing Raymond Carver's short stories achieve. The instability and flexibility here discerned does not warrant philosophico-theoretical "correction," but is rather a place where the complex, nuanced, and morally charged nature of our ordinary language comes into view. We are vulnerable to each other's wordings, but that vulnerability may itself be the very bond that holds us together

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Freudian slip · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Notice · Object (grammar) · Ordinary language philosophy · Philosophy of language · Psychoanalysis · Uncanny · Western philosophy · Contemporary Literature and Criticism · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Literary Analysis · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology

  • The Senses of Walden

    Stanley Cavell•Senses of Walden•1992

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • Must We Mean What We Say?

    Open Access•Stanley Cavell•Must We Mean What We Say?•2002

  • Reason, Truth and History

    Open Access•Hilary Putnam•Reason, Truth and History•1981

  • The claim of reason

    Stanley Cavell•The claim of reason•1999

  • Are There any Women in Shakespeare's Plays

    Sarah Beckwith•New Literary History•2015

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae