Polemic, Diatribe, and Farce
Jaina Postures vis-à-vis Sectarian Others in the Kannada Texts of Nayasēna, Brahmaśiva, and Vṛttavilāsa
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3213034 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Shubha Shanthamurthy (0000-0002-9943-3302, Independent Researcher, Goring, Oxfordshire RG8 0DG, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 1350 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15111350 |
| OpenAlex | W4404114023 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
The Deccan in the first half of the second millennium is marked by political and religious ferment. The Cōḻas, Gaṅgas, Rāṣṭrakūṭas, and Cāḷukyas are contesting its mundane territory, while the Śaivas, Jainas, and Vaiṣṇavas are contesting its spiritual geography. Unlike the interactions of the earthly rulers which spill real blood, the bloodshed of the spiritual gurus is merely metaphorical. But, the animosity driving their interactions is no less intense, for survival is at stake for them just as it is for their secular counterparts. In this essay, I explore the Jaina point of view in sectarian contestations between the twelfth and the fourteenth centuries through the texts of three Kannada authors: Dharmāṁṛtam of Nayasēna (1112CE), Samayaparīkṣe of Brahmaśiva (c.1200CE), and Dharmaparīkṣe of Vṛttavilāsa (c.1360CE). My objective is to identify the sectarian 'other' that these authors address, dispute with and vilify, and to explore the changing nature of this sectarian 'other' and the shifting attitudes of these authors towards their opponents
Art · Kannada · Literature · Computer Science · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Indian History and Philosophy · Philosophy · Study and Philosophy of Religion · Artificial Intelligence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |