Data, algorithms and the asymmetric politics of extraction

Bibliographic Data

ID3213552
AuthorsBenjamin N Jacobsen (0000-0002-6656-8892, University of York, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume73
Issue6
Pages1349-1367
Publication date2025-07-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Sociological Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0261 • E-ISSN: 1467-954X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00380261251352378
OpenAlexW4412402422
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited60

The last few years have seen the rollout of several generative AI applications. Yet, it is often claimed by commentators and social scientists that these have only been made possible through the extraction of people's data without their consent. This review article will provide a critical overview of the notion of extraction. It explores how the term is being used in various scholarly fields in relation to discussions of data and algorithms whilst also seeking to do justice to the term's heterogeneity. The review is structured around three different kinds of extraction: data, human labour, and material resources. It highlights places where the notion of extraction is being used, what it does and makes possible, what it opens up, and what it sensitises us to. By foregrounding the variegated impact of extractive practices and processes, the aim is to continue to lay bare the strategic amnesia on which digital capitalism and the AI industry depends and continues to thrive

Algorithm · Extraction (chemistry) · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Chemistry · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Water Governance and Infrastructure

Tools

Open DOI