The Investigative Function of Congress
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3226492 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George B Galloway (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1927 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 47-70 |
| Publication date | 1927-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1945538 |
| OpenAlex | W2327308032 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 5 |
In the winter and spring of 1923-24 a blizzard of congressional investigations swept the national capital. Party lines were tied up, statesmen were snowed under, and Washington officialdom was chilled by a storm of inquiries into the conduct of government departments. Scarcely a corner of the administration escaped inquisition. The subjects of inquiry ranged from the naval oil reserve leases at Teapot Dome and Elk Hill to the administration of the Veterans' Bureau under Director Forbes of dubious fame. Upwards of two-score inquests were instituted by Congress, through its committees, into the official behavior of the executive branch of the national government. In the end, and as a direct result, two cabinet members lost their portfolios.Such wide and effective use by Congress of its committees for the purpose of inquiry and examination of administrative conduct raised certain questions in the minds of students of government. What were the constitutional limits of the investigative function of Congress? What was the relation of this function to the law-making function and to impeachment? Was punishment by impeachment a satisfactory remedy for official misconduct, or had it become obsolete as too cumbersome? Did the vote of the Senate calling for Secretary Denby's resignation usher in a new process in this country? Should cabinet officials be required to appear on the floor of Congress and answer questions? Would this be preferable to investigating their actions long after they have been performed? Does the steady increase of federal powers necessitate greater supervision by Congress over the President and administrative officers? Have students of politics overlooked a function of Congress frequently and forcibly exercised for the control of administration
Administration (probate law · Cabinet (room · Delegate · Government (linguistics · Impeachment · Misconduct · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,05 |
| Citation span | 1940 - 2013 (74) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |