Reciprocity and the Risk of Rejection
Debate over Sacrifice in the Hebrew Bible
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3233758 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Göran Eidevall (0000-0002-7117-8709, Uppsala University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 422 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel9120422 |
| OpenAlex | W2903674352 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
Sacrifice is a central but contested topic in the prophetical literature in the Hebrew Bible. Whereas some texts criticize the sacrificial cult vehemently, other texts express strong support for such a cult. Interestingly, and somewhat paradoxically, a certain writing, such as the book of Jeremiah, may contain both cult-critical prophecies and passages that promote sacrifices. Divergent interpretations of this ancient debate have engendered an intense scholarly debate. Adopting a new approach, informed by sacrifice theories that emphasize the notion of reciprocity, this article refutes the view that prophets like Amos and Jeremiah rejected all sacrifices. Rather, they (that is, the authors of these books) addressed specific situations, or explained specific catastrophes in retrospect. Viewed from this perspective, the cult-critical prophecies, as well as other references to rejected sacrifice, are in fact compatible with a basically positive attitude towards the sacrificial cult
Aesthetics · Art · Biblical studies · Cult · Epistemology · Hebrew · Hebrew Bible · Literature · Sacrifice · Social science · Sociology · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Philosophy · Religion, Society, and Development
| Highly cited | No |
|---|