Relations of the United States with the Council of the League of Nations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3245726 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clarence A Berdahl (University of Illinois System, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1932 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 497-526 |
| Publication date | 1932-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Political Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/1946469 |
| OpenAlex | W2322633707 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The Council of the League of Nations being commonly considered in the United States as the League's supreme organ, as the body which represents par excellence the League system and spirit, it would seem obvious that there should have been the greater hesitation, in view of our non-membership in the League and our official anti-League declarations, to have direct relations with it. Nevertheless, the record reveals that it has been impossible for the United States government to ignore the Council consistently, and that, as a matter of fact, official relationships of one kind or another have been occasionally entered into with that body also. These relationships have, in the first place, taken the form of direct correspondence between the Council and the United States, which has been carried on at intermittent periods and on various subjects, but which has involved every Administration, and which by this time amounts to a considerable volume
Administration (probate law · Excellence · Government (linguistics · League · Political science · State (computer science · Balkan and Eastern European Studies · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1971 - 1971 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |