Dados Bibliográficos

Resumo

In order to get a snapshot of why this kind of book is so deceptive, a little discursive tour into the matter of “religion” may throw some light thereof. For this, it may be useful to start talking in platitudes, just like the respectful Lefties and Muslims seem to be bend on doing, to elegantly come after any such proposed platitude, followed by efforts to demolish it in whatever way they may, and then crowning such efforts by debunking it through a hortatory coup de grâce (e.g., this may be likened, as it were, to someone who in principle puts out a piñata to have another blindfolded person hit it with a stick in a Lefty hedonist party, but in practice doing a little of discrete cheating by poking little holes into the eye-cover used to peek at the piñata, in order to be able to hit it mercilessly, and win the game). To start with one proposed usual platitude, then, consider that the Lefties have very dexterously monopolized free speech everywhere and use the cancer of political correctness to quash free speech--namely, anything contrary to their liked beliefs or sophistries is viewed as a threat to their very existence. The perceived political correctness problem apparently runs from science to religion, from gender to common sense, just about anything. Picking randomly the subject of “religion”, then, it seems that what may be labeled as “religion” has inadvertently become infested with Marxism, Nazi political theology, and arbitrary judgementalisms all over, just to name some underlying issues. At one extreme in this regard, then, for example, the earlier studies on religion, like that of R.C. Zaehner (1997)’s Encyclopedia of the World's Religions (New York, New York: Barnes & Noble Books) still classified Buddhism and Islamism as “cults”, but not as “religion” (it may be useful to check the reference) because Buddhism may be seem to be something more like an “introspective psychological phenomena” whereas Islamism seems to be more like a “cult” in that cult followers submit irrationally to a dictatorial figure. These believers seem to be captured as in a mental cage like that of a hostage suffering from the Stockholm Syndrome, wherein the hostage may even come to idolize the captor in a romantic relationship. At another related extreme, by contrast, arguably Islamists have been very successful in turning the idea of a “cult” into a “religion”, to heroically compete with other established religions, thanks to the vigorous ideological propping efforts of sham Western academics, whose “academic” hocus-pocus endeavors seem to have thrown academia out of the window to help seemingly questionable political allies. To have an inkling into this, consider nowadays Islamist ideologues like Karen Armstrong, Joe Esposito and other such comrades. Utilizing ideological de-legitimization targeting of Christians and Jews as everybody’s enemies, these Islamist academics picture the world through the political correct lenses of multicultural sophistry, so that, in their constrained cocooned universe of existence, the major religions have become Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism and Islam, respectively. By panmixing and distorting different categories of things like oil and water, they have come a long way, for now most people mindlessly parrot the “religion” and “faith” ideas without ado about nothing, by arguing that “faiths” are similar things in different multicultural contexts, and so on. This kind of religiosity talk has become the common parlance of daily talk shows and otherwise, as it were. On top of that, their Muslim, Buddhist and other cults allies have all joined in the bandwagon like a chorus of cheerleaders demanding equal treatment and equal rights and equal protection under law in Western societies, while elegantly silently denying the fulfillment of those very same things in their own turf to non-Islamists, an open political secret that nobody dares mentioning for fear of angering “other religions”. Thus the unanimous sound of their powerful lobby in the West has successfully quashed any speech that they do not like, which seems to encompass just about everything. So cults have seemingly, as if by magic, become “religions” everywhere in the now frivolous equal democratic treatment process of literally every society, including the West. Incidentally, cynics might argue that Hitler, Stalin and Mao may envy the political finesse of these loyal ideological offspring. As an incidental benefit to Islam, this quashing of free speech, when it comes to any criticism of Islam, has correspondingly meant that the mythical representation of Islam’s founder Mohammed has become a well established sacred cow in deference to Islam. This seems so not because it has been proven to be a fact, but because it has become a highly well-respected and well-protected distorted political correct fact of the Lefties. While the politically correct view of Islamists stamping on the national flags of Kafir enemies and others ridiculing the image of the Christian traditions and Judaism have become acceptable daily routine, so correspondingly the representation of anything contrary to Islam and multiculturalism has to the Lefties become another routine by portraying such representation as a heinous sacrilege--just take the French Olympic Games of 2024, wherein LBGTs were graciously mocking the Last Supper in the presentation of the opening ceremony for the games. Yet, an irony is that Islamism’s “prophet’s existence” still remains a matter of heated controversy, now an issue discreetly only discussed in the sidelines and shadows of academia, which seemingly has forgotten the existence of free thinking and free speech in deference to the Lefties. In spite of this, for example, the more archaeological research gets done, the more doubts emerge about the existence of Muhammad and Islam. For it is questionable whether Muhammad ever existed, except in the imagination of Arabs, just like the Arabian Nights. In this process, it seems, Arabs have been slyly and surreptitiously using Islam as a “religious political theology” platform for sponsoring the idea of the Ummah, to promote thereby a harmonious worldwide Islamist Brotherhood, seemingly a political Trojan Horse used to cover up their iron-grip hold onto their shadow Caliphate. But the Arab Kings have conjured their powerful influence of oil all over to their aid in order to promote Wahabbism, an Arab version of fundamentalist and extreme Islam, going back to the Dark Ages. In this context, it may noted that now a brave new vintage of politically correct academics have seemingly been spreading, mysteriously, faster than a political Wuhan Virus pandemic, and the brave new religious anthropological research have correspondingly become increasing amenable to the liking of Arab royalty (e.g., the brave new breed of Lefty academics are even forcefully promoting the replacement of BC and AC for BCE and CE, respectively, seemingly as sycophantic multicultural deference to “other religions” in order to remove the heinous crime and offenses of Western cultural imperialism). This seems another instance of how cults have, as if by magic, become “religions” everywhere in what seems to be an asymmetrical equal democratic treatment process between the East and West. Having the foregoing comments as background, it is now possible to chat about different denominations in different “religions”, something like ecumenism (e.g., see R.C. Zaehner (1997)). Since the foundation of Islam back in the Seventh Century A.D., a variety of sects have sprung up, mainly ideological descendants of Sunni, Shiah and Khawarij. In their long 1.400-years quest to Islamize Kafir everywhere, incidentally, it seems that Arab Islamists have not hesitated to deploy all kinds subterfuges, including but not limited to forced conversion to Islam, brutalized mass killings, cultural extermination, and so on. This honest Islamist conversion process can be estimated to have yielded 500 million Kafir disappearances in the middle of thin air, and so have the Kafir’s cultural heritage because the existence of the latter offends Islamist culture (e.g., see J. K Sheindlin (2015)’s The People vs Muhammad: Psychological Analysis (Seattle, Washington: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform), whose information can be independently corroborated in standard anthropology and archaeology books). Now, taking a quick quantum trip in time from the Seventh Century A.D. would land us in today’s beautiful Arab Muslim world, where Wahabbism and the Iranian Baha'i Faith may be counted as ideological Islamist offspring, heroically claiming legitimacy and acceptance as ossified orthodox “religions” and “faiths”. That there seems to be a subtle and discreet connection between Islam and the Baha'i Faith may be quickly ascertained through the parallels in their “religious” affinities, blending their creeds with Lefty ideological platforms, like unity, equality and what not, advocating mysticism, millenarianism, modernity, succession, harmonious renewal, creating orthodoxy for the future, and so on (e.g., see Oliver Scharbrodt (2008)’s Islam and the Baha'i Faith: A Comparative Study of Muhammad Abduh and Abdul-Baha Abbas (New York, Routledge)). Although at first blush these denominational sects appear to be different, they seem in fact to walk along the same road of the Ummah. To illustrate how artful the Wahhabi Arabs and their sham Western scholars may be, the Baha'i Faith seems to afford a closer to home example. About this, Robert H. Stockman (2022)’s The World of the Bahá'í Faith (New York, Routledge) ably describes how this so-called faith came to America and how it quickly got help from “Kafir converts”, by plagiarizing Christian doctrine and hymns and representing such as creations of “Baha'i Faith” in harmonious coexistence with “Allah” which was dexterously converted into “God”, to be more palatable to the ears of Western Kafir, and thereby confuse everybody about the perceived nature of “god-hood”. Naturally, when it comes to succession of spiritual leaders, just as the Wahhabi have Abraham and Jesus be just any other prophet in the long line of succession to crown Mohammed as the unique representative of Allah, now the Baha'i Faith moved the representative ahead of the pack of Muslim prophets and the Baha'i now have their brave new unique Muslim representative at the top of everybody else, possibly lasciviously mouth-watering the indisputable supreme inheritor of the Ummah theocracy (e.g., since the “Baha'i Faith” still is a growing minority, it seems that it still has to wait a little while before their dream of achieving supremacy may come to fruition, if that may ever obtain). Thus it has been that this sort of holy alliance between Islam and the Lefties has allowed Islam to spread with amazing speed and success in quickly converting Kafir (i.e., non-Islamist infidels) into new docile little Muslim proselytes, obediently, meekly and irrationally submitting to Wahhabi Islam, their new “faith” (e.g., in this quantum interpretative leap just remember that under the Arab Ummah, regardless of denominational affiliation, all Muslims are One in Islam). In this Islamist legitimization pilgrimage, naturally, there seems to be a large list of poor little lost Western souls who may have found by serendipity a brave new found “faith” in the midst of a very corrupt Kafir world. Partly, it seems that these poor little lost Western souls are the little Muslim laborers doing the hard theorizing work of ideological distortion in their own neighborhood on behalf of their newly found “religious” masters, as a testament of their loyalty to their new found “faith”. An additional glimpse at the foregoing issues may be had by taking a closer look at the lefty literature representing such strain of politically correct research. How far this process of ideological distortion may have come may be seen through two polar cases. Polar Case One: For this case, consider Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (2021)’s A Fairer World is Possible - Proposed Model for a United Nations Reform (Istanbul, Turkuvaz Medya Grubu). In a wider context, it seems that the Muslim friends have allied themselves with the Global South and the Lefties to complain about everything that they perceive as being unfair to them and that they do not like comprising about anything. In other words, as in the case of the loyal and loud complainers of unfairness voiced throughout the “Global South”, so it seems to be the case of Mr. Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s proposal for UN reform. Mirroring all the political concerns of the Global South, the latter’s proposal appears to wish having everybody submit, just like docile Arab Islamists seem to do to a higher moral authority, to their demands including everything without doing and/or giving anything back in return--possibly having the UN become the Arab Ummah UN, period. This weird behavior may be imagined to be something like the nice etiquette of Sesame Street’s “Cookie Monster” devouring everything and leaving nothing to anybody else, apparently without minding about it. As an arbitrary benchmark of comparison, just ask a child to give up his most cherished candy without providing him anything in return: for obvious reasons, the child will not likely take up neither the challenge nor much less any such deal. How does, then, this elegant retinue of Lefty friendly experts of Islam might have missed what not even a child would have missed is a mystery worth considering. But it seems that the EU’s Lefties still see no problem in deferentially promoting biased views in exchange for friendly supporters… Polar Case Two: For this case, consider Chapour Haghighat (1992)’s. Iran, la Révolution Islamique: De la chute du Shah à l'affaire Rushdie (Paris: Mémoire du Siècle). For those who may want to have a glimpse on how Islamist extremism has projected itself onto the political, social and economic spheres and how this has ravaged the Middle East and elsewhere with Muslim blessings, this book may furnish a cursory varnish on some applicable issues. The treacherous nature of the underlyng issues may be seen through a few examples. First, consider that Chapour Haghighat (1992)’s Iran, la Révolution Islamique subtly uses the analytical framework of enthusiast EU Neo-Nazi Marxists class war-mongers. This incidentally reveals how the extremist Islamist theocracy controlling Iran got there, and also portrays the pilgrimage of the honorable genocidal butcher Ayatollah Khomeini, whom the European Left infused with the political sprouts of life (e.g., see Houshang Asadi (2010)’s Letters to My Torturer: Love, Revolution and Imprisonment in Iran). It was the Ayatollah Khomeini who himself hand-picked the Ayatollah Khameini, the current “religious” leader of Iran, as his successor. Using a little bit of demography and existing data, Houshang Asadi (2010)’s account of events discreetly reveals that, after fundamentalist Islamists overthrew the Shah of Iran and ousted his dynasty, the Ayatollah Khameini engineered a Religious Black Death of about one-third of the Iranian population, particularly targeting non-Islamists (e.g., which the EU does conveniently seem to keep in discreet silence in respectful deference to Islamist Arabs, thereby triggering a variety of questions about its motivations for so doing). The Ayatollah Khameini is the current Dark Force angelical totalitarian butcher commanding the Islamist Iranian theocracy of fundamentalist Muslim terrorist thugs ruling Iran. It is these Muslim terrorist thugs who have been bullying around and ruthlessly repressing the political democratic aspirations of their submissive Islamist ideological Iranian slaves (e.g., it may instructive to take a quick look at what may be the different chameleonic faces of terrorism, just by consulting and comparing Richard Jackson et al. (2011)’s Terrorism: A Critical Introduction; also, see Assaf Moghadam et al. (2023)’s Routledge Handbook of Proxy Wars; and take a reading of Erica Chenoweth et al. (2019)’s The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism). Second, the Neo-Nazi Marxist ideology has suffused the extremist Islamist Iranian regime’s theocracy. This extremist Islamist thuggish regime practices the gospel of absolutist political control of everything in Iran, preaching fundamentalist class warfare extermination against all “Kafir” (i.e., apostates, a word that refers to all the non-Islamists, enemies of Islam) worldwide, having as first proximate target the Jews in Israel and everywhere where Jews may be found (e.g., after the Muslin Brotherhood’s Hamas brothers’ assault on the Jews exploded in 7 October 2023, displaying another “just” extremist Islamist explosion of sympathy for “Kafir”, Jews “just” staying on Arab countries reportedly got quickly on their heels, running desperately away out of the gentle hand of antisemitic extremist Muslim Brotherhood thugs, as fast as they could, for fear of losing their life if they dared to stay thereon: so much for chameleonic Muslim tolerance). Third, in retrospect, Chapour Haghighat (1992)’s Iran, la Révolution Islamique seems to conjure, inter alia, just like the science fiction movie nightmare of the Mummy Returns, the underlying problem of the ideological holy Satanic matrimony (e.g., as in the LBGTs) between Nazism, Marxism and Islam in a Black Mass of political correctness. Given that the actors of this story have been so artful in their ideologically related undertakings, this story has to be pieced together a little bit, and hence a snapshot of their undertakings via a political montage “just” may help therewith. Here it goes. To start with, it may help to review preliminarily Adolf Hitler‘s Mein Kampf and Karl Marx’s theoretical sophistries (e.g., for the latter, also see Charles J. McFadden (1939)’s The Philosophy of Communism and W. Cleon Skousen (1961)’s The Naked Communist). Contrasting next the political affinities between Nazism and Communism may not be as farfetched as it may seem at first sight for the modus viviendi of the two dictators coupled with how they managed their respective political systems do not appear to be as distant from each other as first suspected (e.g., see Alan Bullock (1998)’s Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives). To see certain peculiarities, consider the following two extremes. On the one hand, utilizing the chameleonic Messiah of good will to ensnare gullible believers, Hitler and the Nazis got hold of power and their gentle application of that power on their own people and their political enemies through the secret police are well known and documented stories (e.g., see Ulric of England (1997)’s Deutschland Erwache: The History and Development of the Nazi Party and the ''Germany Awake'' Standards and Philip St. C. Walton-Kerr (1996)’s Gestapo: The History of the German Secret Service). In this take-over process, inter alia, one aspect that appears to be less well known is not only the fact that, wheres Joseph Goebbels undertook for the Third Reich what is today known as political warfare propaganda, there is also the fact that Hitler had a mastermind that engineered the Nazi ideological gospel, as it were. This mastermind ideologue was Carl Schmitt, whose teachings not only had an important influence withing Nazi circles, but also has had its influence till nowadays through his “political theology” (e.g., see Carl Schmitt (2019)’s Politische Theologie, Band I & Band II and for the latter influence in today’s EU see Bernd Rüthers (1988)’s Entartetes Recht: Rechtslehren und Kronjuristen im Dritten Reich). Furthermore, concerning the latter issue, it may be noted that Hitler and the Nazis also kindly trained with their Nazi racist purity gospel and hatred of Jews the ideological sprouts of today’s fundamentalist Islamist extremists and terrorists through the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and the PLO (e.g., see David G. Dalin, & John F. Rothmann (2008)’s Icon of Evil: Hitler's Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam; and Richard Paul Mitchell (1993)’s The Society of the Muslim Brothers along with Barry Rubin (2010)’s The Muslim Brotherhood: The Organization and Policies of a Global Islamist Movement). Putting these different pieces of information together suggests that extremist fundamentalist Islam has an a clear affinity with Nazism (e.g., arbitrarily it may be presumed that Nazism may already infected somehow the rest of the Muslim crowd). On the other hand, while the Soviet incursions on the political life of their own people and others are well documented (e.g., see above Alan Bullock (1998)’s Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives), the Soviet adventures via the KGB in the realm of political warfare propaganda has become increasingly better documented throughout the years (e.g., see Chapman Pincher (1985)’s The Secret Offensive: Exposé of the Soviet Disinformation and Ladislav Bittman (1985)’s The KGB and Soviet Disinformation: An Insider's View--obviously this does not arguably mean that Westerners may be Saints of sorts). Between these two strands of idelogical ferment, the pygmy warmongers of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have not apparently hesitated to crash into the party as ideological parvenus, in the process to hurriedly issuing multiple strands of empty sophistries (e.g., see Robert Jay Lifton (1989)’s Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of “Brainwashing” in China and Stefan Halper (2013)’s China: The Three Warfares). Reportedly, the PRC warmongers courageously and silently provided to the Iranian Ayatollah Khameini and to the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood with around 300.000 missiles, which the latter have been using to target their hated Jews. Possibly as a polite reciprocal deference to the oil and trade that the EU undertakes with Muslims, the EU courageously has been ignoring who the instigators of this little conflict are, while cherry picking news about the monstrosities of the Jews for defending themselves against an insignificant multi-front war carried out by Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran (e.g., until 2024 around 150.000 missiles have already landed on Israel, and still the missile barrage continues unabated). The PRC ideological curiosa is mentioned simply because its toxic Maoist ideology has been blending with Nazism and Communism (e.g., see Paolo Filo della Torre, Edward Mortimer & Jonathan Story (1979)’s Eurocommunism: Myth or Reality). Fighting its dark influence now has seemingly become a matter of concern in some countries (e.g., see Kerry K. Gershaneck (2020)’s Political Warfare: Strategies for Combating China’s Plan to “Win Without Fighting”). It seems, then, that putting the story of Chapour Haghighat (1992) within the latter ideological context seems to help in understanding a little better the political background of the gentle dictator the Ayatollah Khameini and his ruthless political eunuchs who are running the Iranian theocracy (and who seem to have a wide spectrum of cheerleaders in the EU, PRC, BRICS and others) for their immaculate righteousness and sense of fair justice towards their neighbors. Finally, while keeping the previous chat in retrospect, the story of Chapour Haghighat (1992)’s Iran, la Révolution Islamique seems to conjure prospectively another set of concerning issues as well in that while extremist fundamentalist Islam has a clear affinity with Nazism and Communism, yet Westerners seemingly unwittingly seem to continue intoxicated with the mirage of multicultural wishful thinking in their blind infatuation with Islam for political convenience (e.g., see Marian Burchardt & Ines Michalowski (2015)’s After Integration: Islam, Conviviality and Contentious Politics in Europe). This political mirage appears to be coaxing the West’ slumber in sleeping together so relaxingly in the same political bed with the Dark Force of Islam (e.g., see Douglas Murray (2018)’s The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam). This political mirage also seems to be the culprit in inducing the West’s daydream to have an interactive coexistence with the Muslim Brothers, a daydream that is propped up by the powerful Lefty lobby of political correctness, a daydream may not end that well (e.g., see Bruce Bawer (2006)’s While Europe Slept: How Radical Islam is Destroying the West from Within), as everything’s well that ends well (e.g., compared to the flooding of Muslims into Western countries, how many non-Muslims live in Islamist countries?). About this, as pointed out above incidentally, not only remember that Carl Schmitt (2019)’s “Nazi political theology”, Nazi racist purity gospel and hatred of Jews have ideologically infected today’s fundamentalist Islamist extremists and terrorists through the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and the PLO--but also remember that Carl Schmitt (2019)’s “Nazi political theology” has ideologically infected as well today’s EU Lefties (e.g., see Bernd Rüthers (1988)’s Entartetes Recht: Rechtslehren und Kronjuristen im Dritten Reich)--then considering such background, not surprisingly the EU Lefties have been promoting the Two State Final Solution (i.e., Palestine State and Israel State, for which the EU Lefties have generously provided the Islamist fundamentalist terrorists of the PLO more than USA$400 Billion to create the imaginary democratic institutions of a modern model Muslim state, and for this just recall as comparative benchmarks the cases of Pakistan, Kashmir, and so on) to thereby seemingly discreetly thank the Arab Muslim Kings for their bountiful supply of blood diamonds oil and Arab Muslim internal market access and plentiful profits, whereas the EU Lefties have been concomitantly, discreetly and graciously turning a blind eye to the underlying problem of so called “Arab-Israeli Conflict” (e.g., see Martin Gilbert (2012)’s The Routledge Atlas of the Arab-Israeli Conflict Tenth Edition (New York, Routledge)). This seems to be highly commendable political diplomacy magic and expediency at its best. It seems puzzling why the honest power brokers of the PLO and Arab Muslim League have not rushed the demand to have the Israeli State show new politically correct flag showing the Palestinian Flag with a swastika as its coat of arms, meanwhile it seems puzzling why the honest power brokers of the EU Lefties and their international allies rush in as cheerleaders to demand it too. In this regard, as a part of a complex set of problems, one related issue seems to be the Western naivete that pictures every person as being inherently honest and therefore worthy of trustfulness, a fallacy that seems to become apparent before the dark cloud of chameleonic courtesy and good wishes of “moderate Muslims” (e.g., remember George Orwell’s The Animal Farm satirical dictum “All pigs are equal, but some pigs are more equal than others”). In view of this politically correct straight-jacketed view of non-Islamist sef-righteousness, it seems that the Jihadist Arab Islamist not-so-well-wishers have thereby graciously acted to take rightful advantage of the open-minded open door policy of “Kafir”. Thus Jihadist Arab Islamists have found a paradise ready to be conquered and are wholeheartedly undermining Kafir tolerant altruistic societies (e.g., remember again Karl Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies) through open infiltration in the higher echelons of Western governments, undertaking Islamist cultural educational institutional brainwashing through the magic influential power of oil (e.g., see Paul Sperry (2008)’s Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives have Penetrated Washington and Paul David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry (2009)’s Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America). Against this panoramic view, it seems that the concerns raised by some observers, namely that Islam is not the best political partner to spend a lifetime in bed with, may not exactly be an exaggeration (e.g., Andrew G. Bostom (2005)’s Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims). And whereas Chapour Haghighat (1992)’s Iran, la Révolution Islamique pictures a heroic Islamist revolution to be commended for overthrowing an apparently parasitic Shah at first sight (e.g., Houshang Asadi (2010)’s Letters to My Torturer: Love, Revolution and Imprisonment in Iran incidentally reminds us that the EU Eurocommunists bred the Ayotallah Khomeini), now the Ayotallah Khomeini’s gentle butcher successor, the Ayotallah Khameini, is bend on annihilating the Jews, to finally complete Hitler’s Jew Final Solution extermination job. As a further illustration of how thankful Western Muslim cheerleaders’ support for the Arab Ummah Muslim Caliphs and their plenty supply of oil (e.g., maybe asking for sainthood is too much in considering the importance that oil per se plays in daily life, but that arguing that flagging the doctrine of the ends justify the means seems disturbing in disregard of everything else…), it may be useful to take a few readings of the so-called “Holy Quran” before prejudging what Islam is claimed to be by Muslims and Western Muslim cheerleaders and what it seems to be therein allegedly since the Seventh Century, to have a little peek into certain intricacies underlying the foregoing chat, unfiltered by political correctness. In one analytical corner of such debate, Western Muslim cheerleaders conveniently appear to have a matter of routine the granting of free diplomatic immunity speech passes to the Arab Ummah Muslims friends, such as welcoming the former “democratically elected” Iran’s President Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s United Nations Speech on September 19, 2006 (e.g., see full transcript at https://www.npr.org/2006/09/19/6107339/, accessed 01-28-2025) who, inter alia, uttered certain statements therein: heroically claimed that: “…Today, humanity passionately craves commitment to the Truth, devotion to God, quest for Justice and respect for the dignity of human beings.…”; heroically claimed that “... [i]t is essential that spirituality and ethics find their rightful place in international relations. Without ethics and spirituality, attained in light of the teachings of Divine prophets, justice, freedom and human rights cannot be guaranteed.…”; heroically claimed that “... [t]he present structure and working methods of the Security Council, which are legacies of the Second World War, are not responsive to the expectations of the current generation and the contemporary needs of humanity…”; heroically claimed that “... Together, we can eradicate the roots of bitter maladies and afflictions, and instead, through the promotion of universal and lasting values such as ethics, spirituality and justice, allow our nations to taste the sweetness of a better future.…”; and heroically claimed that “...All Divine prophets from the Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) to the Prophet Moses (peace be upon him), to the Prophet Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), to the Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him), have all called humanity to monotheism, justice, brotherhood, love and compassion.… 0, Almighty God, all men and women are Your creatures and You have ordained their guidance and salvation…”. And as if to reinforce the grand political philosophy of these heroic statements, it was the very same noble Iran’s President Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s altruistic United Nations’ statements who later on asserted that “…Holocaust: 'Opinion Of Just A Few' …called the deaths of millions of Jews during World War II a "historical event" …[and] dismissed the accounts of Holocaust survivors as "claims”…” (e.g., see NPR’s Holocaust: 'Opinion Of Just A Few' (https://www.npr.org/2009/09/25/113171156/) accessed 01-28-2025). Before and nowadays, it does not seem to be first time that Iranian leaders have called enthusiastically for the destruction of Israel and Jews, one notorious instance of which is the Ayotallah Khameini who have uttered repeated calls for the destruction of Israel and all Jews (e.g., see Fox News Iran's Supreme Leader calls for Israel's Destruction in Twitter screed on Anti-Israel Holiday (https://www.foxnews.com/world/), accessed 01-28-2025). That the claim that “… Holocaust [is]: 'Opinion Of Just A Few' …” seems to be just another noble fundamentalist extremist Islamist political warfare opinion that runs counter to the facts is a matter of historical record (e.g., see Alan Bullock (1998)’s Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. and Martin Gilbert (1993)’s The Routledge Atlas of the Holocaust: The Complete History Second Edition (New York, Routledge). But who knows what may come out of this because knowing that the EU Lefties seem to usually go the extra mile to please the Arab Muslim Oil Kings, cynics might argue, the EU Lefties just might go a few extra miles even to squeeze in a brave new contemporary EU history the obliteration of politically inconvenient facts and just go ahead and claim as well that neither World War Two nor the Holocaust never happened, that such events are the “opinion of just a few”. Additionally, disregarding the fact that reading or listening to such noble talk feels like enduring excruciatingly painful fundamentalist extremist Islamist hortatory Arab Muslim torture of Kafir, it seems to be a difficult endeavor trying to understand how totalitarian dictators--like the Iranian Mullahs, Turkey, PRC, India and elsewhere--may get “democratically elected” by either running esoteric processes underpinning their democratic elections or self-appointing themselves through a variety of maneuvers. And this latter statement seems to be just another individual unfounded opinion. In another analytical corner of such debate, Western Muslim cheerleaders and their Lefty allies have been seemingly exerting themselves in moving forward the cause of the Arab Muslim Ummah, an instance of which seems to be assisting in the “global” political legitimization of the Arab Muslim Ummah’s“armed fundamentalist terrorist branch”, as it were, namely the Islamist terrorist state of Iran, controlled by an cadre of thuggish Islamist theocracy. To illustrate, a case in point seems to be the April 2015 Iran Nuclear Deal Framework Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (between Iran and the P5+1 and EU was announced on July 14, 2015 in Vienna) (e.g., see Wikipedia’s Iran Nuclear Deal Framework, Accessed 01-28-2025). Back then Western Muslim cheerleaders and their Lefty allies and their political media machinery rushed in to commend the grand benefits to everything for such a momentous and towering achieving on behalf of world peace. The Lefties expeditiously handed over to the Iranian peacemakers hundreds of billion of USA dollars, in alleged cash reparations, in the form of oil revenues and otherwise, to allegedly promote nobly Iranian development, progress and improved welfare for the Iranian democracy. So much for the political theology fairy tale of Kafir and Muslim peaceful and harmonious coexistence. Today, though, the historical record shows that it is more than the “opinion of just a few” that the Arab Muslim Ummah quietly sat in great ease and sponsoring all sorts of friendly meetings with the EU Lefties and other allies, just as if they were some sort of state of unconscious Buddhist transcendental suspension like that of “Sleeping Beauty” candidly unaware of their surroundings, while the fundamentalist terrorist state of the Iranian theocracy has been silently weaseling the political muscles of its “armed fundamentalist terrorist branch”. Availing himself with the generous supply of petty cash on hand amounting to hundreds of billions of USA dollars, the Iranian theocracy’s grand leader, the Ayotallah Khameini, has been successfully sponsoring all sorts of risky political adventures not just to produce nuclear weapons, but also the Iranian theocracy has been actively aiding international extremist Islamist terrorists such as Hezbollah, Hamas, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and many others, to attack Israel and destabilize non-Islamist societies. This Iranian aid includes, but it is not limited to, providing to Hezbollah, Hamas, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood hundreds of thousands of missiles and weaponry and infrastructural logistic support like tunnel construction (e.g., via the generosity of the BRICS’s boss the PRC) to mercilessly pound alleged Jewish war criminals, possibly because they deserve it as such. These Iranian sourced military toys have been used to attack Israel and create mayhem elsewhere. It does not seem to be surprising that Israel is so alarmed and bent on eradicating the Islamist terrorists on its territory and otherwise, while the EU Lefty Eurocrats and their allies sit comfortably in their elegant conference centers having vacuous meetings demanding Israeli criminals of war the immediate cessation of hostilities, even manipulating the UN via the ICC (e.g., having impartial Muslim judges) to condemn Israel for its heinous violation of Muslim human rights and issue international arrest warrants to Israeli leaders (e.g., such comfortable political accommodation between the UN and the EU Lefties mysteriously appears to recall some criticisms of UN voiced in some quarters, like that of Miguel Pedrero (2004)’s Corrupción: Las Cloacas del Poder: Estrategias y Mentiras de la Polítca Mundial (Madrid: Nowtilus); there is also a Russian translation of this reference, namely Мигель Педреро (2008)’s Коррупция. лоака власти: как и зачем нами манипулируют (Столица-Принт)). Whereas EU Lefty Eurocrats and their allies may certainly have a different opinion only and divergent values with others, yet it seems that, nonetheless, the international designation of Iran as a state that sponsors terrorism may not be unwarranted after all. In the dark underground of all this weird political pêle-mêle, though, it may wondered whether the Wahhabi Arab Ummah subscribes to an extremist fundamentalist Islamist simplistic logic in relentlessly persecuting the Jews: namely destroy the Jews, ergo destroy the foundations of Christianity, and therewith have Christianity succumb as well. Although such proposed logic seems to be very simplistic indeed, yet a reading of Arab Islamist historical records seems to otherwise suggest the subtle operation of such logic in the long relentless quest through which Arab Islamists have been undertaking the conversion of Kafir and the concomitant obliteration of their cultural heritage. For instance, Egyptians Islamists submit to the Arab Muslim Ummah, not to anybody else. It may be remembered how easily ISIS obliterated the oldest Christian Church in the Middle East, in Palmyra Iraq; by contrast, given the sheer size of the ancient Pyramids in Egypt, it may be wondered whether it may be only a matter of time before the fundamentalist extremist Iranian Islamist get nukes to obliterate them as well, because its architecture offends Islamist theocracy of the Ayotallah Khameini. The Neo-Nazi Eurocommunists do not seem to mind such little things as long as they get to trade with the Wahhabi Arab Muslims and get their oil: Hitler may get his dream come true after all, by having his political offspring undertake the Final Solution, finally. It seems to be a matter of political expediency and convenience. To reiterate and summarize the foregoing chat in a snapshot, then, partly thanks to the help of Western Kafir supporters, it now can be seen how Islam (and mutatis mutandis other “religions”) has had such an amazing success in spreading like a political Wuhan Virus in the West, by rightfully taking advantage of the open door policy of “Kafir”, to undermine their tolerant societies (e.g., see Karl Popper’s The Open Society and Its Enemies). In the background of this rapid ideological propagation of Islam, an important shadow force spearheading this seems to be the subtle and crafty Lefty promotion of cults as “religions” as a result of which cults have, as if by magic, become “religions” in open democratic societies under the doctrine of equal treatment, whereas closed Arab Islamist societies and others have been asymmetrically treating other “religions”. These closed societies have been portraying such discriminatory treatment as “welcome” only if their own cultural heritage is respected, not otherwise (e.g., while reportedly preaching and demanding openness from Western Imperialists for discriminating against Indians and while Indians thereby have been diligently converting foreign imperialist subjects to Hinduism without any obstacles, Mr. Narendra Modi appears to be, showing a little bit more finesse, applying terrorist maneuvers to outlaw, punish with severe penalties, and otherwise expel any foreigner who attempts to convert any Indian into a foreign religion (e.g., compare Richard Jackson et al. (2011)’s Terrorism: A Critical Introduction; also, Assaf Moghadam et al. (2023)’s Routledge Handbook of Proxy Wars; and Erica Chenoweth et al. (2019)’s The Oxford Handbook of Terrorism)). In this regard, under such conditions, in a stylized fashion, it may be convenient to remember Rudyard Kipling’s dictum about the early perception between any cultural interaction between the East and West, arguing that “…never the twine shall meet….” indeed. As a final comment, note that the previous chat heretofore was just another meaningless opinion of just another insignificant Kafir.

Obras Relacionadas