Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deane and Cole on Industrialization and Population Change in the Eighteenth Century

Bibliographic Data

ID3269266
AuthorsLarry Neal (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author)
Year1971
Volume24
Issue4
Pages643-647
Publication date1971-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Economic History Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-0117 • E-ISSN: 1468-0289
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-0289.1971.tb00199.x
OpenAlexW2099605258
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

and W. A. Cole have made impressive strides along a new path of inquiry into the still unresolved question of the relationship between industrialization and population change in eighteenth-century England. In examining regional variations in the growth and migration of population, they are surely on the right track for finding new evidence, and for formulating and testing new hypotheses about the direction and mechanism of causality which relates population increases and industrial expansion. Deane and Cole advance some very interesting hypotheses, but, to use their own words: explanations of the differences in the pattern of demographic evolution in the major industrial counties are largely speculative, and it is not at present possible to check the assumptions on which they are based.2 The purpose of this note is to examine the properties of the statistical technique they use to estimate the amount of population increase in each county which is attributable to migration and how much is due to natural increase. It is then shown that these properties of the statistical technique, rather than the body of data which is worked over by the technique, help to generate the intriguing result of Deane and Cole's work-lthat the bulk of population increase in the industrial counties commonly associated with the Industrial Revolution came from natural increase rather than from migration. It is not the defects in the underlying statistics which are the object of concern in this note, if by statistics Deane and Cole mean the raw data which they use. Rather, it is the statistical technique which they use to work the raw data into usable form which is called into question. I The raw data which Deane and Cole have for each county are estimates of baptisms, marriages, and burials as recorded for each parish in response to census inquiries. These exist for i699-I70i and I749-5I, to give benchmark figures for

Economic geography · Economic history · Economics · Industrialisation · Market economy · Neoclassical economics · Sociology · Demography · Historical Economic and Social Studies

  • Enclosure and population growth in eighteenth-century England

    Open Access•Gordon Philpot•Explorations in Economic History•1975

  • Changes in English Fertility and Mortality, 1781-1850

    Open Access•John T Krause•The Economic History Review•1958

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.02
Citation span1975 - 1975 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae