Foregrounding African Ontology/Epistemology
A Reading of Deuteronomy 23:3 and Ruth 4:18-22 Considering the Nature of God
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3284150 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ntozakhe Simon Cezula (0000-0001-7833-5730, Stellenbosch University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 125 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel15010125 |
| OpenAlex | W4390985102 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
Deuteronomy 23:3, says: "No ... Moabite may enter the assembly of the Lord". This verse is motivated by a discriminatory tendency embedded in the ontology of the Deuteronomist. Interestingly, Deuteronomy 23:3 was used by Ezra-Nehemiah to discriminate against the "Moabites" during the Second Temple. Such ontology is countered by the author of Ruth in the narrative of Ruth during the Second Temple. This demonstrates an ontological "war" within the Bible itself. The primary contestation lies in whether God is exclusive or inclusive. This development necessitates a hermeneutics of suspicion. In the course of history, the "theology" of Deuteronomy has been used to grossly violate the human dignity of many God-fearing African people and many other people of the South for colonial purposes. To exacerbate the situation, there were persistent attempts from some quarters to universalise such a discriminatory biblical perspective. This would feed into the centre-periphery arrangement, with the centre feeding the periphery with such hermeneutics. For this reason, African scholars are implored to be very vigilant against ardent pressures put on the biblical texts by ontological, epistemological, and contextual biases of interpretations. Accordingly, Andrew Mbuvi identifies African Biblical Hermeneutics perfectly when he says it seeks to undo "the very construct of the 'centre-periphery' binary by allowing the possibility of multiple centres"). Kenneth Ngwa, thus, rightly asserts that African Biblical Hermeneutics considers African epistemologies and conditions "to be invaluable and legitimate contexts and resources in biblical interpretation"), drinking from our own wells). In consequence, this paper intends to set a dialogue between Deuteronomy 23:3 and Ruth 4:18-22. This paper aims to examine the understanding of God behind these verses. This paper will then compare the two theologies with the African philosophical concept of God. Harnessing the African concept of Ubuntu, this paper will de-ideologise the two texts and thus will provide a recommendation concerning the two texts
Biblical theology · Dignity · Epistemology · Foregrounding · Hermeneutics · Linguistics · Narrative · Old Testament · Ontology · Sociology · Theology · African cultural and philosophical studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Christian Theology and Mission · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies
Studies in Deuteronomy
African culture, African intellectuals and the white academy in South Africa - some implications for Christian theology in Africa
What is African Biblical Hermeneutics
Engaging with the book of Ruth as single, African Christian women
Purity Ideology in Ezra-Nehemiah as a Tool to Reconstitute the Community
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |