Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The American Revolution

Revisions in Need of Revising

Bibliographic Data

ID3284423
AuthorsEdmund S Morgan (corresponding author)
Year1957
Volume14
Issue1
Pages3
Publication date1957-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1917368
OpenAlexW2046749827
LanguageEN
Citations received7

URING the past fifty years three ideas have inspired research into the history of the eighteenth century in America and England. 'The earliest of these to appear, and the most fruitful of results, was the idea that American colonial history must be seen in the setting off the British Empire as a whole. We are all familiar today with the new insights and new discoveries that have grown out of this view: the great works of George Louis Beer and Charles McLean Andrews, the monumental synthesis of Professor Lawrence Gipson, which now approaches its culmination. This has been a great idea, and it has done more than any other to shape our understanding of the colonial past. A second idea, which has affected in one way or another most of us who study colonial history, is thai the social and economic divisions of a people will profoundly influence the course of their history. This idea received early application toAmerican history in Carl Becker's study of New York politics on the eve of the Revolution and in Charles Beard's An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution. New York politics before the Revolution, Becker said, revolved around two questions, equally important, the question of home rule and that of who should rule at home.' Subsequent historians have found in Becker's aphorism a good description of the Revolutionary period as a whol4 The conflict between different social groups now looms as large in our histories of the Revolution as the struggle against England. Like all seminal ideas, this one has sometimes been used as a substitute for research instead of a stimulus to it. Historians have been so convinced of the importance of social and economic divisions that they have uttered the wildest kind of nonsense, for example

Political science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History

  • Revolution in the Quarterly? A Historiographical Analysis

    Michael A Mcdonnell, David Waldstreicher et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•2017

  • Recent Contributions to American Economic History

    Open Access•Lawrence A Harper•The Journal of Economic History•1959

  • Confederal Union and Empire

    Open Access•Steve Pincus•Journal of British Studies•2023

  • England, America, and the American Revolution

    Open Access•M D Kaplanoff•The Historical Journal•1978

  • Imperial Confusion

    Patrick Griffin, Patrick R Griffin•The Journal of Imperial &…•2021

  • Global Turns

    Colin Kidd•The New England Quarterly•2018

  • Now Wait for Last Year’

    Open Access•David Hamilton Murdoch•The Historical Journal•1980

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,1
Citation span1959 - 2023 (65)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae