Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evoking, Grounding, and Defining

How Contemporary Scientists Connect Religion, Spirituality, and Aesthetics

Bibliographic Data

ID3286120
AuthorsBridget Ritz (0000-0002-0322-9930, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author), Di Di (0000-0003-0475-9690, Santa Clara University), Brandon Vaidyanathan (0000-0002-5748-6051, University of America)
Year2024
Volume15
Issue1
Pages65
Publication date2024-01-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel15010065
OpenAlexW4390581052
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited34

Social scientific research challenges stereotypes of scientists as irreligious, on the one hand, and lacking aesthetic sensitivity, on the other. Yet, while some research suggests connections between these domains, the question remains as to whether and how scientists themselves connect their religion or spirituality with their aesthetic experiences in science. Drawing on interviews with 71 biologists and physicists in India, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we find three distinct logics by which scientists connect these experiences, which we call "evoking", "grounding", and "defining". We also find some scientists assume a modernist logic on which religion or spirituality and science are seen as separate to explain why they do not experience their religion or spirituality and aesthetic experiences as connected. Our findings enhance our understanding of how personal beliefs can shape and be shaped by professional experiences and suggest opportunities for dialogue between scientists and communities of faith centering aesthetic experience

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Faith · Sociology · Spirituality · Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Social Psychology

  • Wanting, liking, and the sociology of motivation

    Open Access•Seth Abrutyn, Omar Lizardo•Sociological Forum•2024

  • Imagining, not Speculating? The Religious Imaginary and Sensibility of Natural Scientists and the Secularisation Debate

    Open Access•Maria Rogińska•Studia Religiologica•2026

  • Beyond Disenchantment

    Open Access•Benedetta Nicoli, Stefano Sbalchiero et al.•Religions•2025

  • Prone to wellness? Dispositional awe, religion/spirituality, and well-being among academic scientists

    Open Access•L Upenieks, Brandon Vaidyanathan et al.•Social Science Research•2024

  • The New Metaphysicals

    Courtney Bender•New Metaphysicals•2010

  • Positive emotion dispositions differentially associated with Big Five personality and attachment style

    Michelle N Shiota, Dacher Keltner et al.•The Journal of Positive Psychology•2006

  • Spirituality of Science

    Open Access•Jesse L Preston, Thomas J Coleman et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2025

  • Can scientists communicate interpersonal warmth? Testing warmth messages in the context of science communication

    Nagwan R Zahry, John C Besley•Journal of Applied Communication…•2021

  • Awe activates religious and spiritual feelings and behavioral intentions

    Patty Van Cappellen, Saroglou•Psychology of Religion and…•2012

  • Comparing spiritual transformations and experiences of profound beauty

    Adam B Cohen, June Gruber et al.•Psychology of Religion and…•2010

  • The cultural authority of science

    Open Access•Gordon Gauchat•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Responding to Richard

    Open Access•David R Johnson, E H Ecklund et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2018

  • Secularity and Science

    E H Ecklund, David R Johnson et al.•Secularity and Science•2019

  • Secularization as Declining Religious Authority

    M Chaves•Social Forces•1994

  • The religion of the heart

    Open Access•G Watts•American Journal of Cultural…•2020

  • The Institutional Logics Perspective

    Patricia H Thornton, William Ocasio et al.•The institutional logics…•2012

  • Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion

    Dacher Keltner, Jonathan Haidt•Cognition & Emotion•2003

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Placing the Normative Logics of Accountability in "Thick" Perspective

    Open Access•Alnoor Ebrahim•American Behavioral Scientist•2009

  • Religiosity and Secularization in the Academic Professions

    Fred Thalheimer•Sociology of Education•1973

  • The Secularization Paradigm

    Olivier Tschannen•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1991

  • On the Incompatibility of Religion and Science

    Rodney Stark•Journal for the Scientific Study…•1963

  • Producing Sacredness and Defending Secularity

    Open Access•Di Di, E H Ecklund•Socius Sociological Research for…•2017

  • Religion and Science

    John H Evans, Michael S Evans•Annual Review of Sociology•2008

  • Spiritual But Not Religious? Beyond Binary Choices in the Study of Religion

    Open Access•Nancy T Ammerman•Journal for the Scientific Study…•2013

  • Scientists and Spirituality

    E H Ecklund, E Long et al.•Sociology of Religion•2011

  • Alternative Spirituality among Global Scientists

    Di Di, Simranjit Khalsa et al.•Sociological Quarterly•2021

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae