Communication, Ideology, and Democratic Theory

Bibliographic Data

ID3294908
AuthorsJames Bohman (Saint Louis University, corresponding author), James F Bohman
Year1990
Volume84
Issue1
Pages93-109
Publication date1990-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1963631
OpenAlexW2319733237
LanguageEN
Citations received28
References cited18

Using Habermas' theory of communicative action and his remarks on the legitimacy of the state under modern social conditions as a starting point, I combine normative democratic theory with the critique of ideology. I first outline four necessary-but-not-sufficient conditions of communication for democratic decision making: such agreements must (1) be formally and procedurally correct, (2) be cognitively adequate, (3) concern issues on which consensus or compromise can be reached, and (4) be free of ideology. The first three conditions form the core of a normative democratic theory, one that is not purely procedural, as many have argued it is. I then discuss the fourth condition and establish the relation between ideology and democracy. Taken together, these conditions not only provide an answer to troubling questions for democratic theory but also delineate the extent to which politics is rational and political claims are "truthlike

Communicative action · Compromise · Democracy · Democratic legitimacy · Economics · Epistemology · Ideology · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Normative · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub