Mutant Utopias
Evening Primroses and Imagined Futures in Early Twentieth-Century America
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3301019 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jim Endersby (0000-0001-8219-4088, University of Sussex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 104 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 471-503 |
| Publication date | 2013-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Isis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-1753 • E-ISSN: 1545-6994 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/673270 |
| PMID | 24341261 |
| OpenAlex | W1602809694 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 33 |
Hugo de Vries's mutation theory is now little more than a footnote to the history of biology, a failed theory that briefly led a few biologists astray. However, for the first quarter of the twentieth century it attracted considerable attention from both professional biologists and laypeople. De Vries's theory--together with the plant, Oenothera lamarckiana, that had supplied most of his evidence--became the focus of a surprising variety of imaginative hopes. Scientists and their various publics were fascinated by the utopian possibilities that the primrose seemed to offer, and their discussions shaped a public culture around biology that would help define the twentieth century as the "century of the gene." From a conventional history of science perspective (which, in the case of twentieth-century biology, often remains focused on the content of scientific theories and the professional communities that shaped them), the mutation theory seems unimportant. However, while De Vries's new theory of evolution ultimately failed to persuade the scientific community, it was much more important than is now realized, particularly because it helped make biology part of a wide variety of public debates. Understanding the mutation theory's story more fully suggests that we may need to rethink much of the rest of the century of the gene's history, to think less in terms of what happened in the lab and more about how biology came to function as public culture
Biology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Function (biology · History of science · Variety (cybernetics · Genetics · History · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Polar Research and Ecology
Victorian Popularizers of Science
Landscapes and Labscapes
The DNA Mystique
The Evolutionary Synthesis
Victorian Sensation
The American Breeders' Association
The Discourse of Physical Power and Biological Knowledge in the 1930s
The Obsolete Necessity
Imperial Nature
Knowledge is power
Did Jenkin's swamping argument invalidate Darwin's theory of natural selection
The Beauty and Menace of the Japanese Cherry Trees
The Battling Botanist
Knowledge Held in Common
Hugo de Vries on Heredity, 1889-1903
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2019 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |