Hubbard Bubble, Dianetics Trouble
An Evaluation of the Representations of Dianetics and Scientology in Science Fiction Magazines From 1949 to 1999
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3310066 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher Benjamin Menadue (0000-0003-4794-8280, James Cook University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 215824401880757 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2158244018807572 |
| OpenAlex | W2896214182 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 22 |
Dianetics was unveiled to the public in the May 1950 edition of Astounding Science Fiction. Dianetics was the brainchild of science fiction author L. Ron Hubbard, and became the foundation for scientology toward the end of the decade. Dianetics was marketed as a "scientific" method for mental improvement-a robust alternative to conventional psychiatry-and was strongly debated in science fiction (sf) magazines. This article follows the trajectory of this cultural phenomenon from 1949 to 1999 as it appeared in this form of popular culture. A proximal reading method was applied to analyze 4,431 magazines, and identified 389 references to dianetics and scientology. References were found in advertising, reader letters, stories, feature articles, and editorials. Significant fluctuations in the prominence and perception of dianetics became clearly visible in the source material across a broad spectrum of content. Negative criticism was present from the outset, and based on logical and scientific arguments. This was countered by obfuscation, or attacks on the authors of these critiques. The followers and promoters of dianetics did not provide scientifically rigorous proof of their claims, and by the mid-1980s, dianetics and scientology were no longer serious topics in the magazines but had been added to other fads and fallacies of sf history. This article demonstrates the effectiveness of a digital humanities proximal reading method to underpin objective classification and analysis of this culturally significant phenomenon
Art · Criticism · Epistemology · Literature · Media studies · Phenomenon · Political science · Sociology · Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies · History · Law · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
The myth of mental illness.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions
Human Culture and Science Fiction
Cities in Flight
Trysts Tropiques
Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis
The Future is Now
Introduction to “Learning to Read Data”
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Therapeutic Revolutions
Who Reads Science Fiction and Fantasy, and How Do They Feel About Science? Preliminary Findings From an Online Survey
Mental illness is still a myth
Madness and Civilization
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2020 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |