Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Observation Claims and Epistemic Confidence in Aristotle's Biology

Bibliographic Data

ID3318217
AuthorsDaryn Lehoux (0000-0002-2134-5003, Queen's University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume108
Issue2
Pages241-258
Publication date2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIsis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-1753 • E-ISSN: 1545-6994
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/692679
OpenAlexW2617306801
LanguageEN

This essay looks at the ways in which Aristotle signals his confidence in observation claims in his biological works. Widely seen as an astute observer of the natural world, Aristotle in fact makes surprisingly few explicit claims to personal observation, even if circumstantial and other evidence often provides strong hints of his own involvement. At the same time, because of the incredible variety (and often the localization) of biological species, Aristotle also necessarily relies heavily on the testimony of others. This essay shows how Aristotle employs careful rhetorical strategies to signal or qualify his certainty both in his own observations and in the reports of others, on a case-by-case basis, for his reader

Certainty · Circumstantial evidence · Epistemology · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Observer (physics · Physics · Political science · Rhetorical question · Variety (cybernetics · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae