Confronting the Limitations of the MFA as Preparation for PhD Study

Bibliographic Data

ID3319141
AuthorsMeredith Davis (0000-0002-1891-878X, Meredith Davis (educator), 3105 Janice Road, Raleigh, NC 27614, U.S.A., corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume53
Issue2
Pages206-212
Publication date2020-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLeonardo (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0024-094X • E-ISSN: 1530-9282
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/leon_a_01600
OpenAlexW2901200012
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited2

Today's design research problems are different from the past; they are more complex and call for inter- and multidisciplinary work. Design faculty and doctoral students are hindered in this work by the curricular content and pedagogy of the terminal master's degree. Students graduate from professional MFA design programs often unprepared to pose truly researchable questions, recognize multiple research paradigms and their corresponding standards, structure methodologically rigorous investigations or even author papers longer than a few pages. These shortfalls persist in the scholarly pursuits of many design faculty and extend to the institutional adoption of alternate evaluation criteria from the research thresholds in other fields. Strengthening of the quality in doctoral research and supervision, therefore, depends to some extent on rethinking master's study in design

Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Graduate degree · Graduate students · Medical education · Multidisciplinary approach · Pedagogy · Quality (philosophy) · Research design · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics) · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Design Education and Practice · Engineering · Medicine

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub