A 21st-Century Environmental Ethic
Theistically-Conscious Biocentric and Biomimetic Innovation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3319418 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Krishna Keshava Das (0000-0002-5168-6503, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Bhakti Wiyata, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1038 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel16081038 |
| OpenAlex | W4413199051 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
This article offers a theistically conscious biocentric environmental ethic that builds upon the scaffolding of Aldo Leopold's land ethic with a synthesis of biocentric individualism, deep ecology, and Vaiṣṇava theology. The practical benefit of this proposed ethic is immediately recognized when viewed in light of innovation in biomimicry. Leopold set a fourfold standard for environmental ethics that included (1) acknowledging the evolution of consciousness needed to give rise to ecological conscience, (2) surpassing anthropocentric economic interests in ecological decision making, (3) cultivating individual responsibility and care for the land, and (4) offering a unified mental picture of the land to which individuals can relate. We defend his original work, from later interpretations where the communal aspect of the whole overshadows the uniqueness of the different parts. Transitioning from mitigating overemphasis on the value of the collective, we turn to biocentric individualism, which despite overvaluing the individual, identifies the practical necessity of a qualified moral decision-maker in discerning individual value within the web of nature. Deep ecology articulates self-realization as the qualification that this moral agent must possess. A theistically conscious biocentric environmental ethic balances the role of the individual and the collective by recognizing their irreducible interdependence as a simultaneous unity-in-diversity. This principle of dynamic oneness is introduced in deep ecology and fully matures in Vaiṣṇava theology. Individuals have particular functional value based on their unique role within the Organic Whole, and genuinely self-realized decision-makers can assess these values appropriately enough to discern how human civilization can flourish through harmonizing with nature. In many ways, this is the basis for biomimicry, a field where thoughtful people observe nature's problem-solving and adapt those same strategies and design principles to humanity's challenges. The development of biomimicry affirms the central thrust of the proposed environmental ethic, which can reciprocally inspire further biomimetic progress
Anthropocentrism · Biology · Consciousness · Deep ecology · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Individualism · Political science · Sociology · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · Ecology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|