Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The loss of innocence' in historical perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID3336201
AuthorsBruce G Trigger (McGill University, corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume72
Issue277
Pages694-698
Publication date1998-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAntiquity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-598X • E-ISSN: 1745-1744
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003598x00087135
OpenAlexW1772998671
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

The dual tasks of this paper are to examine David Clarke's ideas about the development of archaeology as they relate both to the era when 'the loss of innocence' was written and to what has happened since. In his treatment of the history of archaeology offered in that essay, Clarke subscribed to at least two of the key tenets of the behaviourist and utilitarian approaches that dominated the social sciences in the 1960s: neoevolutionism and ecological determinism.Clarke viewed the development of archaeology as following a unilinear sequence of stages from consciousness through self-consciousness to critical self-consciousness. The first stage began with archaeology defining its subject matter and what archaeologists do. As its database and the procedures required for studying it became more elaborate, self-conscious archaeology emerged as a 'series of divergent and selfreferencing regional schools ... with regionally esteemed bodies of archaeological theory and locally preferred forms of description, interpretation and explanation' (Clarke 1973: 7). At the stage of critical self-consciousness, regionalism was replaced by a conviction that 'archaeologists hold most of their problems in common and share large areas of general theory within a single discipline' (1973: 7). Archaeology was now defined by 'the characteristic forms of its reasoning, the intrinsic nature of its knowledge and information, and its competing theories of concepts and their relationships' (1973: 7). Clarke looked forward to a fourth (and ultimate?) phase of self-critical self-consciousncss, when the new archaeology would monitor and control its own development

Archaeological theory · Archaeology · Consciousness · Determinism · Epistemology · Innocence · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Subject (documents · Anthropology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Nuevos fechados del sitio Tarapacá-40

    Mauricio Uribe, Carolina Agüero et al.•Ñawpa Pacha•2015

  • Chapter 1. Is Archaeology Anthropology

    Open Access•D L Nichols, R A Joyce et al.•Archeological Papers of the…•2003

  • Two cultures

    Michael Shott, Michael J Shott•World Archaeology•2005

  • A arqueologia como paradigma de ciência histórica e interdisciplinar

    Open Access•Astolfo Gomes De Mello Araujo•Estudos Avançados•2018

  • Boats, Bones, and Biface Bias

    Open Access•Jim Cassidy, L Mark Raab et al.•American Antiquity•2004

  • World prehistory

    Grahame Clark•World prehistory•1969

  • Analytical Archaeology

    David L Clarke•Analytical Archaeology•2014

  • Problems in European Prehistory

    F R Riley, Colin Renfrew•The South African Archaeological…•1980

  • Archaeology and Epistemology

    Bruce G Trigger•American Journal of Archaeology•1998

  • Archaeology

    Duncan Clarke, David Clarke•Antiquity•1973

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,22
Citation span2003 - 2018 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae