The Āyurveda and the Four Principles of Medical Ethics

This paper examines the ethical frameworks that guide Āyurvedic practices and compares them with those underlying contemporary Western medicine. At the heart of current bioethical debates is the question of whether certain principles can be universally valid across cultures. This paper argues that while the moral vision of Āyurvedic medicine significantly differs from that of Western medicine in various respects, both systems share fundamental ethical principles, notably beneficence and non-maleficence. However, important distinctions arise in their respective conceptions of autonomy and justice, suggesting that these principles may not be as universally applicable as the former two. Drawing on the "four principles" approach of modern Western medical ethics, as outlined in Beauchamp and Childress's Principles of Biomedical Ethics, this paper challenges the assumption that the principles of autonomy and justice are culturally neutral. Through a comparison with Āyurvedic ethics, we highlight how these principles may not be as universally relevant as commonly assumed, raising important questions about the possibility of a global bioethical framework

Engineering ethics · Political science · Sociology · Engineering · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology

• Medical ethics

  Open Access•Raanan Gillon•BMJ•1994

  Add to list

• The Medical Ethics of Professionalised Āyurveda

  Dagmar Benner•Asian Medicine•2005

  Add to list