Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Common Knowledge

Bodies, Evidence, and Expertise in Early Modern Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID3363748
AuthorsJ Andrew Mendelsohn (Queen Mary University of London), Annemarie Kinzelbach (Film Independent)
Year2017
Volume108
Issue2
Pages259-279
Publication date2017-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIsis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-1753 • E-ISSN: 1545-6994
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/692680
OpenAlexW2617430018
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Over the past twenty-five years, history of science has expanded into history of knowledge. Plurality has been the main message. Commonality, by contrast, is the main finding of the present study. It examines the knowledge practices of the full range of participants in cases of public inquiry—trials, tests, inspections—involving human bodies in contexts of criminal law, police, public health, marriage and family, claims to community aid, and regulation of trades. The cases come from the archives of three agencies of inquiry and evaluation—a government, a university faculty, and a guild—in a variety of polities in the Holy Roman Empire between about 1500 and 1650. Participants of widely differing education, occupation, and experience—learned, artisanal, and domestic, as well as specialized versions of these—are found to have shared practices of observation, description, explanation, and argument. This finding opens the prospect of a history of shared empirical rationality, in contrast to the hegemony of difference, dialogue or transfer, and "expertise," in how we understand knowing in modern as well as premodern Europe

Argument (complex analysis · Criminal investigation · Criminology · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Hegemony · History of science · Oral history · Political science · Public relations · Rationality · Social science · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Anthropology · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Historical Philosophy and Science · Law · Medicine

  • By any other name

    Eric H Ash•History and Technology•2019

  • Every expression is watched’

    Open Access•John M Carson, John Carson•Social Studies of Science•2018

  • Rethinking Expertise

    Harry Collins, Robert Evans•Rethinking Expertise•2007

  • May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide

    Brian Wynne•Risk, Environment and Modernity•1998

  • The Meaning of Signs

    Claudia Stein, Claudia L'Engle Stein•Bulletin of the history of medicine•2006

  • Erudite and Honoured Artisans? Performers of Body Care and Surgery in Early Modern German Towns

    Annemarie Kinzelbach•Social History of Medicine•2014

  • The Eye of Everyman

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Social Studies of Science•1998

  • Partners in marriage and business? Guilds and the family economy in urban food markets in the Dutch Republic

    Open Access•Danielle Van Den Heuvel•Continuity and Change•2008

  • The Gendering of Witchcraft

    Laura Kounine•German History•2013

  • A Social History of Knowledge

    Open Access•James M O’toole, James M O'Toole•Archives and Museum Informatics•2001

  • Medical Expertise, Bodies, and the Law in Early Modern Courts

    Silvia De Renzi•Isis•2007

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2018 - 2019 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae